User talk:Frank/rfasandbox

Looks nice;  Works for me. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks; just to clarify: did you look at the editing syntax? I'm not just after looks but something that works for others to maintain.  Frank  |  talk  21:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

The table looks pretty simple to edit. I just noticed one thing, though: would it be possible to indicate the number of each request (eg. Kww (3rd))? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

We seem to have been inconsistent on this in the past; some do, some don't. I'll check it out. The ordinals thing might be tricky, but...this template work was actually quite a bit trickier than I expected because of it being within wikitable syntax anyway. I'll take a look at that.  Frank  |  talk  21:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Alright, that wasn't so bad and I fixed another issue too. It will break when someone reaches their 21th RfA. :-) And, technically, if a 1 is put in for first, documentation says to leave that out but...will probably have to add a test for that too.  Frank  |  talk  22:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks! :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Looks fine. Sadly I'm no coder, so I cannot give you a technical opinion, but it's nice aesthetically speaking. Sorry I can't give a more helpful response! PeterSymonds (talk) 22:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

I was less than clear. What I'm interested in is whether or not you think it's an improvement - even considering the new syntax that would be required for each new entry in the table. I already made the same visual change on the "real" page; but now I think the syntax is easier and a bit more flexible in this templated version. I'm asking for a sanity check on that assertion.  Frank  |  talk  00:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Yes, from that perspective, it's clearer. A definite improvement. PeterSymonds (talk) 01:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Superscripts, anyone?

Check out the fourth row of the table; uses a different (sandbox) version of the rfarow template. A bit much?  Frank  |  talk  22:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Looks fine to me! Enigma^msg 05:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)