Frank Booth Luce

Thanks

	For improving the Agnes Moorehead article
	I've noticed you've put in a lot of work improving the Agnes Moorehead article and wanted to say thanks. As an award icon I chose a photo of a radio-microphone from the 1930s as a nod towards Moorehead's extensive career in radio, especially on CBS. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 00:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

hey

Well trevor does where a dress in which he cross-dresses in women's clothing, and it doesn't matter whether or not it says it in the article because wikipedia cannot be used as a source anyway, also I notice your fairly new to wikipedia and that you have more to learn about the site, and I make childish hurls do I? here's one word of advice to a fairly new wikipedian, when you correct another users editing mistakes, don't be a jerk about it. Wikiman103 talk 14:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wikiman103 talk 15:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

• First off, please do not accuse me of vandalism.
• Secondly, as I understand the category system, they are supposed to capture aspects of the article's subject that are defining based on the coverage of the subject within the article. Trevor may very well play every scene he's in wearing the latest designer fashions but if the article does not mention it and cite reliable sources for it then it cannot be pointed to as defining of the character. Perhaps if you approached the issue with a little less hostility and a little more humility this would be clearer to you.
• I do appreciate that you have acknowledged that you made an editing mistake. I see that another editor has correctedyour repeated mistake and I suggest that should you wish to discuss it further you open up a comment on the article's talk page. Frank Booth Luce (talk) 19:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Otto4711, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 23:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)