Welcome to Wikipedia.

Hello, Frankieleelee, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation

--ΜιĿːtalk 10:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Swig Judaic Studies Program

edit

Hello there! Thank you for your contribution and efforts on the article. I appreciate it and it indeed has inproved the article quality. I have done some light copyediting for you as an example to help you expand the article further. I would like to urge you to be bold in updating articles after taking some time off editing and refering to WP:MOS guidelines which should help you compile good quality articles. Best of luck! Cheers! --ΜιĿːtalk 12:59, 8 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Scientific opinion on climate change

edit

I removed the material that you added because I see its relevance to the current politics and questions about the science, but not to the current scientific opinion. I'm sure that that will evolve over the coming weeks and months. Your edit is still visible in the article's history (your work is not lost), and I imagine that it would be useful at the article about the hacking incident. It's that Wiki must wait for things to happen before reporting connections and repercussions (e.g., how this issue will affect the scientific opinion), even though they may seem obvious extensions of an event at the moment. At that point, if this issue becomes important for some reason, it can be mentioned in regard to how scientific opinions may have changed because of it. I hope you understand; if not, you can leave me a message, Awickert (talk) 05:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply