Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Michael Howard page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --BigDT 23:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Branson, you will be blocked. Thank you, Juux 07:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

edit

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 13:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wandsworth edit

edit

Hi, always nice to see a new editor on the scene. Yes, I deleted the food shop fact. It referred to Wandsworth borough (which has its own page), and not the town, the subject of that article. Feel free to add the fact to the borough article, but make sure that it is cited correctly. Uncited facts will be deleted, even if they do pertain to the article's subject. Brief guidelines are to be found here. Sorry if you feel hard done by, but Wikipedia is designed as an enyclopedia, with all the accountability and verification that goes with that. Maybe the following would be of help to you:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Pyrope 20:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


London amora

edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article London amora, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ...maelgwntalk 05:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply