Freddythemushroom
January 2015
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — MusikAnimal talk 21:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Freddythemushroom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I started out by making some immature edits, but I had started trying to make some constructive edits when you blocked me without any reason. Therefore, please at least lower the block.
Decline reason:
Continuing to vandalize Wikipedia after receiving ample warnings that you would be blocked isn't reason enough for you? I'll have to disagree. You made a single edit that wasn't clearly vandalism, out of six edits to articles in total. That's not inspiring any confidence in your good faith. Huon (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
block
editYou were given warning ... I'm sure if you agree to behave and make constructive edits the block will be lifted
Kap 7 (talk) 21:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I most certainly will.Freddythemushroom (talk) 23:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Please unblock me
editFreddythemushroom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am extremely sorry for everything I did and would be very thankful if you shortened my block. If you do this, I promise to be a good Wikipedia citizen. I look forward to your response. Thanks, Freddythemushroom (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Read our guide to improving articles
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
- Click the Edit tab at the top of that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
- Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this:
= [[Article title]] =
) and save the page before you improve it. - Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
- When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}
" to your talk page. Thank you. Kinu t/c 22:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I made my edit
editFreddythemushroom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I made my edit. Thanks, Freddythemushroom (talk) 02:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Wikipedia does not permit users to create additional accounts to evade a block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- What, if any, is your relationship to User:Fattythefatbear? --Kinu t/c 04:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
The 2015 New England Revolution season is the twentieth in the club's existence, as well as their twentieth season in Major League Soccer.
In
editDate | Player | Position | Sending Club | Notes | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 18, 2014 | Jeremy Hall | MF | Toronto FC | Acquired via trade in exchange for a 4th round pick in the 2015 MLS Superdraft | |
November 25, 2013 | Sean Okoli | F | Seattle Sounders | Acquired via trade in exchange for a 2nd round pick in the 2015 MLS Superdraft | |
January 9, 2014 | Juan Agudelo | F | Stoke City | Signed as a free transfer |
Out
editDate | Player | Position | Destination Club | Notes | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 10, 2014 | Patrick Mullins | F | New York City FC | Expansion Draft | |
December 10, 2014 | Tony Taylor | F | New York City FC | Expansion Draft | |
January 2015 | A.J. Soares | D | Hellas Verona F.C. | Out of contract |
SPI notice
editYou are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Freddythemushroom. Thank you. --Kinu t/c 20:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)