Welcome

edit
Hello, Freeallangels! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NSH001 (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

--NSH001 (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

PS. Please take a little time to follow and read the links above. They will save you a lot of time and effort in the long run. --NSH001 (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

please stop edit-warring

edit

Please recognise that the change you are attempting to edit-war into Norman Kember has no chance of "sticking", since —in addition to being patently false— it is unsupported by the rest of the article, and therefore violates Wikipedia policies (see WP:LEDE, WP:BLP).

Please note that anything likely to be challenged needs to be cited to reliable sources. This applies even more stringently to Biographies of living persons, where uncited material can, and should, be removed on sight. In general, material in the lead does not need to be cited as long as it is merely summarising information which is correctly cited in the body of the article.

I am now asking you to revert your own change, and discuss on the article talk page how the article can be improved. Please note that edit-warring is just wasting your own time and everybody else's, and if you persist you are likely to be blocked for disruptive behaviour.

--NSH001 (talk) 13:45, 18 December 2009

It is interesting that because i have a different view to you about the neutrality of language that you describe me as "edit warring" (presumaby you're own re edits are not?)and try to threaten me if you do not get your way. I have indeed argued my case on the talk page as you well know. You're assertion that calling Kember a "political activist" is "patently false" is absurd as is the idea that it is not supported by the article. The article states that "He described his reasons for going to Iraq to demonstrate his opposition to the invasion of the country by the United States-led coalition and to show solidarity with the Iraqi people." Whether you like it or not, that is a political statement and position and agitating for one particular view in a war is plitical activism. There is a perfectly legitimate debate here about keeping language neutral, please do not try to threaten me with blocking just because you disagree with that.