Freecharlesgrace
Speedy deletion of Kutt Calhoun
edit
A tag has been placed on Kutt Calhoun, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Azazyel (talk) 23:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Kutt Calhoun
editI have deleted this page again. There was very little different from the original article which was determined, by consensus, not to have established notability. I'm going to protect the page for a period of thirty days during which it cannot be recreated. IF after that 30 days you have found enough to establish notability with WP:BAND, WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO I would be open to revisiting the article. Trusilver 00:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
A lot of the information you added to Sizzla is not really about Sizzla, rather about him being a rasta, or Judgement Yard. The rasta information should be left on the rasta page, you wouldn't include a "Christian" section in Garth Brooks because he's Christian right? Some of the Judgement Yard stuff was good information. I will be making heavy edits to that article over the next week, and look forward to your contributions as well. smooth0707 (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- You're right, I don't know why I thought it was you. My apologies. smooth0707 (talk) 01:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)