Friessj

The Integer Group

A tag has been placed on The Integer Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. gb ^{(t, c)} 21:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Can you tell me why it's okay for TBWA and Omnicom (our sister agencies) to have articles up but not Integer? It was not an advertisement. Friessj (talk) 23:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Removing speedy deletion notices

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Integer Group. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. gb ^{(t, c)} 21:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. gb ^{(t, c)} 21:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I've added references that now hopefully qualify the article as notable. Friessj (talk) 22:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Integer Group

A tag has been placed on The Integer Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tnxman307 (talk) 20:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Improving The Integer Group

I'm glad that you're taking steps to improve this article. You may want to see How to write a great article and the Manual of Style. If there's anything I can do to help out, let me know. Tnxman307 (talk) 20:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Got your message

Hi there, Friessj. Got your message. In order to write a good article that will stay in Wikipedia, you need to read some of our relevant policies. First, go read Your first article. Then, read our guidelines on notability, and especially about writing with a neutral point of view and writing with reliable sources. Also, I have a hunch that you are personally involved in this company, so I encourage you if that's the case, to read our conflict of interest guideline. After reading these guidelines, if you still feel that Integer group would be an appropriate article, please revisit my talkpage and tell me why. Include sources that talk about your subject, not just written by your subject. Wikipedia is neutral and only includes articles about notable, verificable subjects. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)