Fritz.nielsen
Linak
editHi Fritz! It looks like the first version of Linak was deleted because it was very short and did not explain why the company was notable. The second version was deleted (by me) because it was written like an advertisement, and in fact appeared to have been largely copied from the company's own press releases. If you can write an article that explains the company's notability, supported by reliable sources, and that maintains a neutral tone, feel free to repost. Thanks, NawlinWiki 12:14, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
LINAK - started
editSo - I just made my first article :) I hope I did everything right?
I have added some sources to the article.. I hope it meets the demands regarding reliable sources etc.
Logo
editI have uploaded the official LINAK logo. I can be used in the LINAK artivle.
Thanks for creating the LINAK article.
The article Linak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Looks to just be advertising with the external links.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I am One of Many (talk) 02:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
The article Linak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This article appears to by promotional (advertising) with no third party independent references. Also, appears to be independent research.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I am One of Many (talk) 06:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)