User talk:Frosty/archive3

A cookie for you!

Hi there. I've seen you have done a lot of work reverting vandalism (and you usually revert faster than me haha). Have a nice day! RomtamTalkToMe 07:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

yay another cookie —Frosty ☃ 08:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Sandy I Am not sure I am doing this right since I am new to "Talk" . Anyway my edits weren't for play it was meant to reflect better the current situation

                                                          sincerely
                                                         original Bobov

Hi, I don't understand. All you did was change some uppercase letters to lowercase and remove letters from a word... How is that to "reflect the current situation"? —Frosty ☃ 08:45, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

User talk:23.16.25.230

Can you replace your message on User talk:23.16.25.230 with {{subst:uw-removevandalism}}? Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:13, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

holy crap, I see what you mean now. Consider it done. —Frosty ☃ 10:26, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Assalam o alaikum frosty. I receive your message. I want to tell you that please help me how I create a new Page

Moazzam Ahmed Kamangar (talk) 01:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Excuse Me

My contributions to that article were absolutely constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.58.254.222 (talk) 04:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

No it wasn't. —Frosty ☃ 05:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Excuse yourself

it's so obvious guerillero and elaqueate are tag-teaming to own that article it's not even funny. Let him go after me, that'll prove he's lying about his bullshit "CU" crap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.101.184 (talk) 05:39, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

No need to get all angry about it though. If you have been socking or whatever you're being accused of, it will be found to be. If you are innocent of what you are being accused of, then that is what will be found. Swearing and getting angry achieves absolutely nothing. —Frosty ☃ 05:43, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Artificial Hair Integrations

Hi Frosty. Jim1138 asked me to cite a source for my edits, so I did. I'm so sorry to make you think I'm spamming, as originally I did not cite a source. My studies for this subject date back some 25 years at the London College of Fashion. My edits relat back many centuries to the old fashion wig-making skills of the Europeans in the 17th Century. I am honestly trying to be accurate without any favor to any business I have in relation to the subject. I'm just passionate about this particular accuracy. Hope you can help as I'm new to Wikipedia and upset by the inaccuracies and hardship in fixing them. LynneWalsh (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

I was mainly confused about the external link you referenced in the section heading, it seemed like it was placed either there as spam or by accident, and because of the warnings you already had I may have assumed the former. Feel free to revert, just take that reference out, not just because it looks like spam but it also breaks the page formatting. 11:22, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. I just uploaded it again and hopefully it'll work this time. I put the citing reference in the 'Cite' area instead. Sorry, I'm just new to this. Hopefully will get the hang of it soon:) LynneWalsh (talk) 12:23, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Falcao

FALCAO NEVER WON THE EFE TROPHY. PLEASE STOP THE MADNESS AND PUT CRISTIANO RONALDO AS THE REAL WINNER OF THE EFE TROPHY IN 2012-2013. I HAVE CORRECTED THIS A HUNDRED TIMES AND YOU KEEP CORRECTING ME WITH THE FALCAO DREAM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.139.3.21 (talk) 11:49, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Um what? I don't know what you are referring to, could you please provide a diff or link? Because you hae no recent contributions... —Frosty ☃ 12:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Paula Jones

I thought it was fair enough, because Paula Jones is definitely a bitch.216.3.9.69 (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

That is an opinion. It also violates WP:BLP so yeah, please don't... —Frosty ☃ 01:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

World of Tanks

107.178.43.99 is a shared IP address used by the puffin web browser. Someone else must have made that edit to the "World of Tanks" page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.178.43.99 (talk) 02:18, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Ok, if you want to avoid being confused with different people making vandal edits might I suggest you make an account? :) —Frosty ☃ 02:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

TARIAKI

	TARIAKI
	I DONT KNOW WHAT A FILE IMAGE IS aleki (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Help:Files might be able to help you if you are unsure what they are. —Frosty ☃ 06:54, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2014

• In the media: Plagiarism and vandalism dominate Wikipedia news

• News and notes: Media Viewer—Wikimedia's emotional roller-coaster

• Traffic report: Viral

• Featured content: Cheats at Featured Pictures!

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Mahfiruz

Yes this is truth, I removed it, because this is full with the Fantasy of so called Mahidevran Fans. Since the series Muhtesem Yüzyil, many storys are written here in wikipedia.

At this time in the Harem was not own Ottoman Cousins who married Ottoman Princes.

Mahidevran is not Ancestress to any living Members of the Ottoman Dynasty.

Mahfiruz was a greek, who came with other slave girls in the Harem.

And not a relative to Mahidevran...

Ask the Ottoman Dynasty.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.112.141 (talk) 21:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

If you blank content or make other major changes without an edit summary and/or discussion you wil probably get reverted. Explain why and what you are doing in the future please :) —Frosty ☃ 02:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi

hi thanks for the message i just want to see if i could edit i was going to change it back — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.243.32.224 (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Okey doke, if you want to do editing tests please use the sandbox in future :) —Frosty ☃ 23:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Cameron, Oklahoma, USA

Hey you edited out my addition to the page Cameron, Oklahoma, USA. I am from said town and what I added is what most everyone in and around the town call it "The pothole capital of the world." So please don't change my edits without a real reason to edit it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hosssawyer (talk • contribs) 01:42, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

You have been since reverted three more times, stop adding it. I searched this, nowhere else on the web has it been called this. —Frosty ☃ 04:24, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi there

I think what I've done with the glans picture is the correct resemblance to Koscielny. Please do not mark it as vandalism thanks

Sincerely — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.215.36.142 (talk) 11:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Samiri

Hi, with regards to the article Samri(Islamic figure), i edited the content since the comparison given between Samri (who is despised and cursed in Islamic theology) and Abu Bakr (who is a renowned, respected and esteemed) is not fair. In fact even if we take literary proof as our primary evidence, their is no legitimate base for this argument and no reliable references can be cited for the given argument( that Samri and Abu Bakr are of similar character). On contrary the comparison seems to be made on the behest of personal bias against Abu Bakr, which the author of the article might hold due to his/her' adherence to Shia Branch of Islam, which holds antagonist view towards Abu Bakr. In fact if the author thinks my view is contrary to truth then let him cite reliable reference for such comparision. 50.184.169.113 (talk) 01:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Ok. First off though, you blanked more than 12 kilobytes worth of article without presenting any reason in the form of an edit summary, so please use these in future. A change involving so much being removed or re-worded also should be discussed on the article's talk page first. Hope this helps. —Frosty ☃ 08:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

• Arbitration report: Media viewer case is suspended

• Featured content: 1882 × 5 in gold, and thruppence more

• Op-ed: Automated copy-and-paste detection under trial

• Traffic report: Holding Pattern

• WikiProject report: Gray's Anatomy (v. 2)

• Recent research: A Wikipedia-based Pantheon; new Wikipedia analysis tool suite; how AfC hamstrings newbies

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Question

Hello. Should we report the IP that keeps reverting our edits on KRNV-DT and KRXI-TV? I know that it was the most recent and another, because in my notifications has two diff. IPs. If we don't report them, lets just protect the pages... what do you think? Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 04:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

I'd say not, I really only wanted to see a reason for the removal of content. Also I doubt it's an actual vandal as the sort of vandals that blank entire sections will usually come back and blank other parts of the article. I'll keep an eye on it though. —Frosty ☃ 04:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Okay. Check the KRNV-DT article. I reverted this IPs edits because 1) they keep removing the former logo, and 2)They keep removing the "Current" staff. There's no point and trying to communicate with them because the just blank their talk page. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 04:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

That page I'd be inclined to try and get semi-protection because there are multiple IPs and they are removing significant quantities of the article. Can't see the point in reporting the IP's to admins, they seem to be switching too much for that to have any effect. —Frosty ☃ 04:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

I'll put in a request. Indefinite or temporary? Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 04:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Temporary. No need to lock it down forever. —Frosty ☃ 04:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Sounds good, thanks! Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 19:45, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

DECLARATION

I HEREBY COMMAND ALL BUREUCRATES TO GRANT ME THE POSITION OF ADMINISTRATOR, BUREUCRAT, CHECKUSER AND STEWARD! I COMMAND ALL EDITORS TO ACKNOWLEDGE ME AS PRESIDENT OF THE WIKIPEDIA! - THE TRUTH WILL BE VICTORIOUS! — Preceding undated comment added 04:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Okay? —Frosty ☃ 04:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

AS MY FIRST ACT AS PRESIDENT OF THE WIKIPEDIA I BANISH ALL PUTINISTS FOREVER! - THE TRUTH WILL BE VICTORIOUS! — Preceding undated comment added 05:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Edit to the description of Thailand

Hi Frosty, I edited a description of Thailand as it was completely degrading and unnecessary. The text portrayed Thailand as nothing more than a brothel, with inflammatory remarks about the sex industry which are completely subjective, bordering on libelous. The 'information' it contained, particularly the following:

"Although officially illegal, prostitution in Thailand is monitored and regulated by the government..."

is completely incorrect. There is no evidence to back this absurd claim up. The idea that it's regulated despite being illegal...well, the mind boggles.

I simply believed it wasn't appropriate for Wikipedia - as quite frankly, it disgusted me to read such nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.151.35.1 (talk) 07:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Alright, do you think it would be best to just remove it all together or if you had a go at trying to reword it so it sounds more neutral? If the former, you need to say what you are doing in an edit summary otherwise it looks like blanking for no reason and it gets reverted. —Frosty ☃ 07:22, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

My personal advice: Give rewording a go, it had a citation so it's probably at least partially true but just in need of tidying up. —Frosty ☃ 07:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

2602:306:334b:e320:45c:7320:ef8b:f2be

Wow, you revert him and then he leaves a message on my page threatening to kill me? I have no idea how I got into this. Anyway I reported him to AIV since he vandalised after your level 4 warning. Regards, --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 00:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

What a eh... delightful fellow. —Frosty ☃ 00:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Edit

sorry it was a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.56.129.88 (talk) 08:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Okey doke. —Frosty ☃ 08:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

7.35 times 14

7.35 times 14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.178.47.89 (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Huh. —Frosty ☃ 03:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Regarding your deletion of a comment of mine

you recently deleted a comment of mine on a page named "Ascension Episcopal School" saying the content I added was not necessary. The entire page is a satire being made by a group of people about a fictitious place based off of a legitimate school. The people and events on the page are fictitious. This satire is being done as part of a project promoting different ways art can be created on the internet, communal art, and literature. It has been difficult maintaining the integrity of the art piece as we develop it when its edits are constantly being removed. Please undo your edit and avoid future edits of this page to maintain the integrity of the artwork. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.190.217.110 (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

It appears all of that has been removed and replaced with the actual article. Please don't make joke articles... —Frosty ☃ 07:41, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

A true CATFISH, I was away on a holiday and my project page was being attacked by vandals. You valiantly jumped in and beat them away with a stick. I'm still only new to all this and help like that makes things easier. Mjw1990 (talk) 03:13, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome :) —Frosty ☃ 09:35, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Creating an account

How do you create an account? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.0.86.18 (talk) 17:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Special:CreateAccount, hope to see you soon. —Frosty ☃ 23:11, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Feminist

Seriously, are you a feminist? It's ok you don't have to answer if it makes you feel uncomfortable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.178.34.15 (talk) 01:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

No, feminism like a lot of things in this world has become overrun with people that have since forgotten what it was originally about. It's nothing short of a joke anymore. Once it was relevant and a good thing, that day has long since passed. Why do you ask? —Frosty ☃ 01:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Because we all know australians are feminists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.0.86.18 (talk) 01:40, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

I see. —Frosty ☃ 01:46, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Hub Network

why did you erased striked out programs on the hub? --24.170.75.206 (talk) 01:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

If something isn't relevant, just remove it with an explanation rather than the strikeout tag. The strikeout tag is silly, especially in templates. —Frosty ☃ 02:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Did you erased edited for time? --24.170.75.206 (talk) 04:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Graphology

I'm sorry I left the edit summary blank. I'm quite new to this, so thank you for informing me about this. I would not agree with your contention that graphology is a psuedo-science and that most empirical studies fail to show its validity. Please do look up the website of the International Graphological Colloquium which has a list of peer-reviewed research studies, most in foreign languages which support its validity - http://www.igc-grapho.net/research-in-graphology. I know you'll point to the Beyerstein book but I strongly advise you to read the book "The Beyerstein Book: A Critical Examination" written by Marcel Matley. It talks about the various drawbacks in Beyerstein's "research" and how he has misunderstood various concepts of graphology. I'm not talking about the graphology in which one stroke means one trait and in which the interpretation does not change. I'm talking about proper scientific graphology in which the whole handwriting is considered and each element is considered in relation to another.

-- 182.72.155.182 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.72.155.182 (talk) 05:26, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

I see. Look, I won't pretend to be any kind of expert in this field; I was using Huggle which is a program that detects vandalism/blanking/major changes and your edits definitely qualify as major changes. If you want to make changes like this, I recommend you start a talk page discussion about it first and try and get opinions off other people. —Frosty ☃ 06:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.72.155.182 (talk) 08:55, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Halo effect

Sorry for not explaining my editing. I am new here :) As for the content I removed, it was redundant since it is nearly verbatim mentioned under the section "Gender differences". —aeQin — Preceding undated comment added 11:45, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Alright, cool thanks for explaining :) —Frosty ☃ 11:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2014

• Op-ed: Media Viewer software is not ready

• Traffic report: Refuge in celebrity

• Featured content: The louse and the fish's tongue

• WikiProject report: Checking that everything's all right

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Userpage vandal

I already reported them at AIV, thanks for the reverts. Do you often encounter this much abuse? Altamel (talk) 03:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem, oh yes vandals don't seem to like me for some reason... —Frosty ☃ 04:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

The Cheetahmen ‎

I have a problem. I changed the entry for Cheetahmen, in which the action gamemaster is clearly getting grasped into the screen by the testicles, rather than the leg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.83.38.161 (talk) 04:59, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

I'd stick with leg, this article subject is a thing for kids so I doubt it's actually by the testicles, even if it looks like it is. —Frosty ☃ 05:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Army Men III removed because

Thank you Frosty for being kind. There is a trademark violation in the article of Army Men with the use of Army Men III using the brand name without permission. I removed this only because it is not a real Army Men game produced with the proper rights and assets permissions. The game itself violates the Army Men trademark title by using it in the name. Since they have not properly obtained the brand name. What is the problem with removing a game that is not even supposed to exist since it did not have the proper permissions before creating the game and releasing it on here. They claim that it's the final installation to the Army Men series when it never got the permission to be so. That is a great reason to remove content that should not be part of the series article on Wikipedia since it's violating that trademark that they don't own the rights to. It's not a official Army Men game let alone the fact a legal game to exist on this Wikipedia article. Army Men III I ask for this to be removed because it is not a real Army Men game produced with the proper rights and assets permissions. The game itself violates the Army Men trademark title by using it in the name. Since they have not properly obtained the brand name. I am asking that removing the game since it is not even supposed to exist since it does not have the proper permissions before creating the game and releasing it on Wikipedia. They claim that it's the final installation to the Army Men series when it never got the permission to be so. These are some reasons I ask for the removal of this games content that should not be part of the series article on Wikipedia. Since it's violating the trademarked brand of Army Men. They don't own the rights to the game series and they never have. They have not even tried securing the rights by asking for them in order to create this game. It's not an official Army Men game let alone the fact a legal game to exist on this Wikipedia article. The game is a obvious trademark violation due to these standards they have failed to meet before establishing the game as the final installment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.171.23.129 (talk) 05:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Oh ok, thanks for clearing that up. If you want to sort things like that out in the future, you can always use Wikipedia:Copyright problems. —Frosty ☃ 05:15, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Frosty very much yeah this has been a problem. I just have not been able to tackle it by myself. Anyways if it is possible to remove this permanently when it happens to show up please let me know since it doesn't belong on here. I really appreciate you.--78.171.23.129 (talk) 05:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

No real way to remove it permanently because people can just re-add it, just keep an eye on the page every now and again I suppose. —Frosty ☃ 05:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Alright I will go ahead and do that then until that company stops posting it on here. I don't have a problem if a official release comes up under that name though. Just the one that doesn't have the rights. So that link will help me be able to submit a trademark violations report?--85.107.179.76 (talk) 05:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes, just be sure not to make it a threatening report. Just state what the problem material is and that you would like it removed, there is definitely no need to make legal threats about it. If it's a problem and is obviously a problem/you can prove it's a problem, we tend to be helpful about it. —Frosty ☃ 05:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Gregor Robertson

The man is an appalling shill for the development industry. He is an anathema to democracy. His party repeatedly grants rights to developers over the wishes of thousands of taxpayers. Currently there are 13 or 14 lawsuits against the city. This is simply incredible that citizens have to resort to litigation to preserve their community. He obviously cares for power and little else.

In my opinion, Vision modus operandi includes peddling influence to anyone who pays them money (NPA was no different, just not so blatant).

Below is the verbatim copy of the Criminal Code of Canada, Sec 123

123. Municipal corruption

123. (1) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years who directly or indirectly gives, offers or agrees to give or offer to a municipal official or to anyone for the benefit of a municipal official — or, being a municipal official, directly or indirectly demands, accepts or offers or agrees to accept from any person for themselves or another person — a loan, reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for the official

(a) to abstain from voting at a meeting of the municipal council or a committee of the council;

(b) to vote in favour of or against a measure, motion or resolution;

(c) to aid in procuring or preventing the adoption of a measure, motion or resolution; or

(d) to perform or fail to perform an official act.

Influencing municipal official

(2) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years who influences or attempts to influence a municipal official to do anything mentioned in paragraphs (1)(a) to (d) by

(a) suppression of the truth, in the case of a person who is under a duty to disclose the truth;

(b) threats or deceit; or

(c) any unlawful means.

Definition of “municipal official”

(3) In this section, “municipal official” means a member of a municipal council or a person who holds an office under a municipal government.

End citation.

So when Vision grants "relaxation" to developers who have contributed to the campaign (Westpoint, Henriquez Partners, Rize etc) a literal reading of the law would leave a reasonable man to believe a criminal act may have taken place.

I am not a vandal, but a seeker of truth. The man is garbage and hopefully a court will find him and his party are guilty of selling influence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.84.238 (talk) 09:42, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

It is still just an opinion. It also violates Neutrality policies and Biographies of Living persons. I know and accept that most public figures may have a small or even a large group of people that don't approve of them but you have to keep it neutral at all times. Believe me, there are articles on various people that I don't like that I think deserve to be scathed instead of neutral, but that's the rules and I don't make exceptions just for people I don't like. The same applies for you and everybody else on the project. —Frosty ☃ 09:53, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Apologies

Sorry about that; just a timing issue, I think. 331dot (talk) 12:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

No problemo, easy fixed so no harm done. Happened to me a few times like that. —Frosty ☃ 12:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about the last edit. I saw you page was being vandalized and you did not seem to be on line. I thought that was just one more in a series but I should have considered the different IP and the content. Now I need to revert the notice as well. Donner60 (talk) 01:52, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

All good, easy mistake to make. :) —Frosty ☃ 01:53, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

cunt

Dear Mr whippy, I mean Frosty Where's the ice cream at? Thanks for changing the name of yarrow Stadium back, However you are incorrect as the name has officially been changed to Brad Thomson is gay international football Stadium. Please do not edit things without prior knowledge. P.s you're a tool

YO BRO I KNOW JONNY HOPE AND HE'S A HO!

Sup man - I recently made an edit to George Hope's page saying his son is a knob. I'm sitting next to him now, and can confirm that he IS a knob, so please explain why I was not allowed to post it on the wikipedia page of his father? Thanks 2001:DF0:0:200E:5EF9:DDFF:FEEA:E12B (talk) 02:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC) ME

Um... because you can't write opinions into articles. Please don't? —Frosty ☃ 02:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

ITS NOT AN OPINION WHEN IT'S A FACT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:DF0:0:200E:5EF9:DDFF:FEEA:E12B (talk) 02:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Mistake

Its a mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlshiru (talk • contribs)

Um. Ok. —Frosty ☃ 12:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Michael Scott

I made the revision for satirical reasons. In an episode of "The Office" Michael says how Wikipedia is reliable because anyone can write an article, and you know you are getting the best possible info. I wanted to challenge that belief. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.16.185 (talk) 22:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Yeah well, please don't. The information on here is supposed to be satirical. —Frosty ☃ 22:41, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Lighten Up

It's not a serious article after all and none of the information was offensive. Nonetheless, I apologize. I appreciate the voluntary(?) work you guys do to stop idiots (like me ;)) from editing pages and the way you have to put up with idiots verbally abusing you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.16.185 (talk) 22:43, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome I suppose. —Frosty ☃ 22:48, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Look, man. I apologized no need to be passive aggressive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.16.185 (talk) 22:50, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

I wasn't being. —Frosty ☃ 22:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2014

• In the media: Turkish Twitter outrage, medical translation, audience metrics

• WikiProject report: A trip up north to Scotland

• News and notes: Wikipedia's traffic statistics are off by nearly one-third

• Traffic report: Tolstoy leads a varied pack

• Featured content: Which is not like the others?

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Letting you know...

That this isnt really vandalism or blanking. In fact the IP was being helpful by removing a duplicate section, remember be more careful when huggling as the large diff without explanation by an IP editor may be a helpful edit. On the other hand good job with your other vandalism reverts! --Acetotyce (talk) 01:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes I saw the latest revert with an edit summary so I understood why it was being made. Without an edit summary it just looks like blanking so I revert yeah. And thanks :) —Frosty ☃ 01:46, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Apologies

I'm really sorry for the things that happened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.73.118.18 (talk) 11:59, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Ok —Frosty ☃ 12:03, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

My edit

What I wrote was the truth — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.239.7.4 (talk) 11:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

No, it was vandalism. Don't make edits like that again, it is a waste of both our time. —Frosty ☃ 11:35, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

Hello I'm sorry for that edit my sister went on my phone and did it trying to prank her friend sorry and how did u find it quickly? Awesomecp331 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awesomecp331 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

By using Huggle, which will redflag most vandal edits. If that is the case with your sister (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time, although not everybody would), make your password secure and don't leave yourself logged in. —Frosty ☃ 23:05, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

LEVEL 3 HEADING

HI I LIKE THE WIKI PEDIA it's heaps good — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.181.237.74 (talk) 09:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Well... Good for you I guess. —Frosty ☃ 09:59, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Bears FC Reason beacause I erase team

I delete squad because I will put new team this team is not correct — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trobinson66 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

I see. It would be helpful to recent changes patrollers if you removed the old content and added the new content in one edit and/or used an edit summary. :) —Frosty ☃ 08:45, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trobinson66 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 27 September 2014 (UTC)