User talk:Frosty/archive5

Hello Frosty

People are editing the page with a fake item with no sources. I am simply removing them. The (In his dreams) line was a joke. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TiffanyMcMichealson (talk • contribs) 03:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

I see, it would probably be better (and less confusing) to simply remove false information rather than making it into a joke, seeing as how I didn't see the false information being added and had no way of knowing. Thanks for reverting vandalism though. —Frosty ☃ 03:29, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Blease ban user "Zachrance" from making edits to that particular page. He keeps vandalizing the orginal wikipedia entry with his false item. He is now reverting to trolling the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TiffanyMcMichealson (talk • contribs) 03:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

No can do, I am not an administrator. However, I will request the page be protected temporarily. —Frosty ☃ 03:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Please lock the Frankie Grande wikipedia page

People are trolling and vandalizing it by putting in a fake partner on his profile page. Frankie Grande has been single for a couple of years and people are putting in a fake relationship with someone who has no relations to him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TiffanyMcMichealson (talk • contribs) 03:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

As I said before I am not an administrator. I do not have access to the blocking, deleting or protecting tools. All I can do is request these things be done by someone else. My advice to you is to not engage them further for now, last I checked the user in question was on a level 3 warning and will be soon blocked if they persist. Just sit on the sidelines for a while, if they are guilty of wrong doing they will be blocked. —Frosty ☃ 03:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Hey, sorry for the inconveience. But next time I will watch out, but hey wanna be friends. Cb808 (talk) 03:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I love your articles. keep up the good work my friend! Cb808 (talk) 03:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit outs

Frosty, why do you edit out something on a page built to be edited? I'm up all night, sick as hell, cheesed off at the Hall of fame pundits. 22 years as a stagehand, including being production coordinator at the concert for the hall, Cleveland '95. Please let me batch for a minute. I earned it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazmatmonkey (talk • contribs) 06:14, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Huh? —Frosty ☃ 10:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Heyyy

So I was strolling through the page, Orphan, and then found myself on the page Native Americans in the United States. I saw Jacoby Ellsbury listed and I was like, neato.

Then I checked the history and came across this Australian kid that likes to admin Uncyclopedia. Would that Australian happen to be Sir Frosty? As in you? Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 22:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Yeeees, tis I. —Frosty ☃ 01:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Gnarly. Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed

Nicole Aniston

Why do you keep taking down my info? I know Nicole personally and it's all facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DontTakeItDown (talk • contribs) 03:20, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

You have no source and even if you did, the information is inappropriate. —Frosty ☃ 04:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Cold war medal article that you fixed

Frosty, there is a massive propaganda campaign going on under Russian order and links to this article are widely used on russian news sites. The article is untrue and in my edit of it I provided an explanation why. There is no official cold war medal, it's a fake! You can remove the article all-together if you don't like my edit, but please don't help using wikipedia as a source of russian propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.72.156.77 (talk) 10:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

The article cited multiple sources and a simple google search of the subject gave many results, so I do believe the medal exists. If you feel it is biased in some way or needs clean up, make a discussion about it on the talk page. However, you shouldn't just blanks pages if you feel something is wrong. Reasoned discussions with other editors is the best way to get things done. —Frosty ☃ 10:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Retard

Hello i am also a freaking retard tomarrow at 8 am i am going to die thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.223.38.244 (talk) 00:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Uh... Ok. —Frosty ☃ 00:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Re:October 2014

I delete the current storm information because IMD issued last bulletin and no more update for Nilofar.--60.246.219.103 (talk) 14:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok, I encourage you to use edit summaries to explain content removal in the future. —Frosty ☃ 20:52, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

• Featured content: Go West, young man

• In the media: Wikipedia a trusted source on Ebola; Wikipedia study labeled government waste; football biography goes viral

• Maps tagathon: Find 10,000 digitised maps this weekend

• Traffic report: Ebola, Ultron, and Creepy Articles

• Recent research: Informed consent and privacy; newsmaking on Wikipedia; Wikipedia and organizational theories

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Deleted comment

Sir you deleted my comment loooool. Im fine, but i dont believe you're really a catfish xDDD jk its all cool bruh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.202.137.31 (talk • contribs)

Of course I'm a catfish. Prove that I'm not. —Frosty ☃ 23:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Trouting

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.171.205.132 (talk • contribs)

Oh. —Frosty ☃ 22:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Whaling

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.171.205.132 (talk • contribs)

Oh. —Frosty ☃ 22:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

deletion request

some lame fanfiction-type crap--76.21.6.165 (talk) 03:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

People are allowed that kind of thing in userspace if they want it to be there. And I can't delete things, I am not an administrator. —Frosty ☃ 03:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

It actually does look kinda hoaxy and unwanted, even for a userspace draft. There's also a whole network of those by the same user in various userspaces (for some reason), conveniently listed here. I'd recommend a group MfD nomination. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 03:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Oh, my mistake. —Frosty ☃ 01:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Wikipedia:Main Page alternative (editable): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 01:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Isn't that page in itself a sandbox of the main page? I didn't feel a warning was necessary given that. Please correct me if I'm wrong. —Frosty ☃ 01:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

After you say that, I actually believe you to be correct (however I am still unsure on the matter). My apologies. --I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 01:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

All good, also not that I personally mind, but you really shouldn't issue templates like this to experienced users. These templates are really just for new editors. :) —Frosty ☃ 01:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

• In the media: Predicting the flu, MH17 conspiracy theories

• Traffic report: Sweet dreams on Halloween

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Daily Show humor

Well, my edit doesn't highlight an appealing aspect of the show, but it is certainly accurate.Syzygos (talk) 04:59, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Eh.... Please don't, it's not cool. —Frosty ☃ 05:03, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't intend to reinstate the edit; it always raises hackles among the show's fans. There are dozens of sources that have taken note of this obsesssion of Stewart's, however, and it doesn't do justice to readers who want to learn about the show to avoid informing them about what is a pervasive and characteristic trope.Syzygos (talk) 03:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Ted Turner Is A Talking Dog

Ted has kept this secret under wraps, but it was very cool. I think he has the right to be private with this information… But i figured that you could help us all out with it. Ted Turner is actually, a talking dog. a dog who speaks english. American dialect. He owns the turner channels. It's a good thing he's a talking dog. Everybody loves the shows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheersfan (talk • contribs) 09:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Oh I see, and I presume this is well sourced information? No? —Frosty ☃ 10:38, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Whale smack

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.207.233.223 (talk • contribs)

Thank you very much. —Frosty ☃ 06:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

WHY ARE YOU DELETING FACTUAL INFORMATION JUST COZ YOU DONT LIKE IT

HI, A simple question for you , but I think you will not answer , HOW can a fact that is true and been shown in an English court of law to be a true fact, be classed as, in your words " negative unsourced content" I can provide the relevant documentation to prove what I entered on the BAFRA page , and you have taken it upon your self to sensor a matter of fact. Can you please show me in the Wikipedia rules , were it stats that facts should be removed from the pages and also why it is also classed as defamatory. Please remember I can provide documentation stamped by a judge in an English court of law to prove this fact , also documentary evidence , signed by the person I was naming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.18.72 (talk) 13:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

The key point you have missed is unsourced, you did not provide an external link or reference in the article which confirmed your claim. For all I know, you could have just been making it up. —Frosty ☃ 22:18, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

from archive 5

Please understand that I, revert a lot of edits like that every day. And by edits like that I mean, edits that sound slanderous but at the same time COULD be true. I don't have time to look it up in every case, so I remove it. The automatic messages you receive tell you why you have been reverted and I'm now asking you to please include sources if there is even a slight chance information you add could be questionable and also to keep your wording as neutral as possible. Attacking me is not doing you a service here, I'm telling you how to correct this and believe me when I say I don't have to help you, but I am. —Frosty ☃ 00:23, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

It needs to be available in the form of a link to an external website. —Frosty ☃ 00:37, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

They should when it comes to potential libel against a significant person. —Frosty ☃ 00:44, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

You have no evidence, no sources and it's still slander. I am just repeating myself here, you need something more than just the claim you are some person (which I have no way of knowing if you actually are) coupled with half a sentence of anger in an article. —Frosty ☃ 00:56, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Source information does not have to be available online or linkable, but you need to identify the source so other people are able to verify the claim if they want. If your source is a court decision, see Legal citation for how to reference that court case and Wikipedia:Citing sources for why we need to identify our sources. Please keep in mind that it's not just about being able to reference a source - the information has to be relevant to the subject. The claim of adultery does not seem to be relevant to information about the Trophy, but it would be relevant on the referee's biography page (if it existed). If the claims have caused a scandal affecting the Association, resulting in a court case and media coverage, then such information might be added to the Association's page under its own heading. Crētus (talk) 23:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

I fully see your point cretus, and your explanation has made more sense to me than the previous entry's. I fully understand Frosty's point now 86.152.18.72 (talk) 20:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Fargo to Faggot

On undoing the change i made to the Mig-15 article it was a spelling change. It should read Fagot instead of Fargo that is listed in the Design and Development section of the article. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NATO_reporting_names_for_fighter_aircraft

Ok, please use an edit summary in the future, it is really helpful to recent changes patrollers. —Frosty ☃ 04:16, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Shawty

I write true stuff why do you remove it!!!?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.0.242 (talk • contribs)

The information already present explained the term well enough, your addition seemed unnecessary and silly. —Frosty ☃ 06:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

• In the media: Amazon Echo; EU freedom of panorama; Bluebeard's Castle

• Traffic report: Holidays, anyone?

• Featured content: Wikipedia goes to church in Lithuania

• WikiProject report: Talking hospitals

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

I had a laugh

Thanks had a good laugh !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gronkisagoon (talk • contribs)

Um, you're welcome? —Frosty ☃ 04:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

YAHWEH

Hey Frosty! I understand my edit to the page YAHWEH may not seem constructive, for I replaced all the content. But I noticed that most of the content in the article was false, and I was lead to reproof the article. Please revert the page to my edit :) --Jesus Christ loves you

I'm not going to restore it seeing as how it is not constructive. —Frosty ☃ 04:42, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

I did this late at night and wasn't able to add much information to the page. If I was to add much more information to it (I had very little content previously) could you please consider allowing my edit to pass? --Jesus Christ loves you

Gronk

Emily is the love of my life, and I'm trying to do sumthing. Really meaningful for her, GRONK is her favorite player and I want to show her I'd move mountains for her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camdanger (talk • contribs)

Vandalizing Wikipedia is hardly moving mountains. Try writing a song, bound to be way more effective. —Frosty ☃ 06:10, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

U r cool

Mickyv1.2 (talk) 15:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! —Frosty ☃ 21:50, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank You! Here's A Pie For You!

JBeags Thanks for fixing my page, some of my classmates changed it to try to be funny, I'm glad you fixed it, how did you get to it so fast? JBeags (talk) 23:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem, via WP:HUGGLE it picks up on vandalism pretty quick. —Frosty ☃ 23:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

How does it know what's vandalism and what's not? Does it filter words? JBeags (talk) 23:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Not sure exactly how, but it assigns a number score to edits on the Wiki. The higher the number the more likely it is vandalism. It's based around key words, age of the account, has the user been warned about vandalism before, etc. But that's probably simplifying it a lot. —Frosty ☃ 00:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Batman vs Superman

Hello!

It is against Wikipedia rules to accuse people of vandalism when no such vandalism has taken place and could result in you having a 'meeting' with some wiki higher ups. I made the edit in order to see what my ip address was in order to check recent edits. Unfortunately by the time the edit was confirmed on my screen I already had a message on my talk page, meaning I was unable to revert. As such, what I did was clearly not vandalism.

Kind regards, a very tired ip address (which the wiki bot will sign anyway) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.222.229.123 (talk • contribs)

Oh I see. For future reference, please conduct edit tests in the sandbox. You can also check contributions from your IP via Special:MyContributions. —Frosty ☃ 05:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Andres Iniesta Height is incorrect

It is supposed to be 171cm or 5ft 7 inches" Source: http://www.fcbarcelona.com/football/first-team/staff/players/a-iniesta Thanks! Subhrajit

Oh, I only reverted because of the ref tags that stuffed up the formatting (I assumed you were testing edits). Feel free to correct the height, just be careful not to add extra markup. Using the preview button helps. :) —Frosty ☃ 06:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

C.A.Cupid

Sorry if I messed up, my friend was fooling around on it and I wasn't paying attention. I don't know what she did but I apologize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.141.94 (talk • contribs)

It's alright, it was easy fixed. —Frosty ☃ 22:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

A poem by some guy

Your cool just like frost But you have no right to say who's boss I'm not here to fight And I don't bite I just like to rhyme Im just wasting my time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robotypeedit (talk • contribs)

dafuq? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.230.157.201 (talk • contribs)

Uh... Thanks. —Frosty ☃ 01:15, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

From your user page

Thanks for corrections on USC, you can delete this after you read it, I'm not sure where you send messages. Im glad someone caught my mistakes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mingzhangzhuchingchong (talk • contribs)

You're welcome. —Frosty ☃ 02:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

I was just fooling around .I am glad that you fixed what you found to be Inappropriate . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.179.172.123 (talk • contribs)

It's alright, please use the sandbox in future if you want to play around. —Frosty ☃ 23:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright

I think your violating copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robotypeedit (talk • contribs)

Where and how? —Frosty ☃ 02:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, in regards to my reverted comment, I do say that Harry Reid is a National Socialist and will stick to my beliefs. Good day — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zraymond (talk • contribs)

But you would need a source on that to make that claim. You also vandalized a name to "Dick Butt". Please cease vandalizing, you are however welcome to contribute constructively. —Frosty ☃ 10:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

IDGAFOS

You didnt accept my correction but unfortunately I got true ! Have a look on Internet about this song ! Its "I drive Girls Around For Oral Sex" NOT "I don't give a fuck or shit" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.60.115.110 (talk • contribs)

You would need to verify such a claim with a reliable source. —Frosty ☃ 22:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Stan Collymore

Frosty - how can a wife beater, a pyromaniac, a person who threatens to murder women not be a tw@t. By removing my text you are in agreement of that individual not being a tw@t. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.228.3.188 (talk • contribs)

His article on Wikipedia should be about his career and why he is notable. Yes, it is apparent that he did those things you mentioned, but making reference to them in the article (which has already been done) is enough. It doesn't matter how terrible a person is, we don't slap insults into their article. —Frosty ☃ 22:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

semiprotection?

If you want your user talk page semi-protected, feel free to ask. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Nah it's fine, a lot of new users/anonymous users do have genuine questions and other stuff they want to run past me. Not going to lock them out, based on the actions of a few vandals. —Frosty ☃ 04:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Dont try to change it again please

Information icon Hello, I'm Frosty. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 11th Field Artillery Regiment because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. —Frosty ☃ 03:57, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your infromation. I was asked by my leadership of the 11th Field Artillery Regiment to remove the article as it contained information that we cannot post online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmak421 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok, please use edit summaries when removing large portions of articles in the future. Thanks. —Frosty ☃ 21:13, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I'm sorry frosty i shall stop. :)

Carkeves (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

It's alright, happy editing. —Frosty ☃ 05:21, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

WHY??

	SAD :( (made me sad!!!)
	This is sooooooooooooooo bad u just edited my stuff :( it was bcoz me myself didn't know wht a covalent bond was and ppl need to lookup here only when they don't know about stuff!!! :( I am not abusing or angry just sad Epicflora (talk) 05:43, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

There was an interwiki link to the Covalent Bond article already present in that sentence. If people wanted to know information about Covalent Bonds, all they would have to do is follow that link. There is really no need to include definitions in articles, all you need to do is link to the word you are defining with an interwiki link. —Frosty ☃ 22:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

• Featured content: Orbital Science: Now you're thinking with explosions

• In the media: A Russian alternative Wikipedia; Who's your grandfather?; ArtAndFeminism

• Recent research: Gender gap and skills gap; academic citations on the rise; European food cultures

• WikiProject report: Back with the military historians

• Traffic report: Big in Japan

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Rebuttal on Update 11/28/2014

Frosty,

You said that my edits to the Second Invasion of Manchuria were redundant because I used Joseon instead of Korea. However, in the historical context, there was no "Korea" during that time period. The use of Korea did not come into existence until the the modern age and so, during that time people living on the Korean peninsula would identify themselves as Joseon. As such, I believe my original changes should be reinstated in order to articulate a more historically accurate description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.244.131.216 (talk) 03:08, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Hmmmmm perhaps you are right. However, the country used in the text should match that of the title. IMO, your best course of action would be to open a discussion about moving the page and changing the name within the text. However, at the current title it may confuse some readers if you alter the text. —Frosty ☃ 06:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

I LOVE DOLLAR COINS

I LOVE DOLLAR COINS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.2.215.2 (talk) 03:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Good for you, but please stop vandalizing pages with this fact. —Frosty ☃ 04:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Brian Babin

FROSTY,

In regard to the Brian Babin wiki page - please see the ongoing dispute in the Brian Babin:talk page

Thanks Wikiblanks (talk) 01:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok, you need to use edit summaries when blanking content. Something quick and simple like "as per talk page discussion", other wise it just looks like blankign to recent changes patrollers. —Frosty ☃ 02:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for working the EST night shift :) — MusikAnimal talk 03:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Heh not a problem, all part of being downunder ;) —Frosty ☃ 04:05, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for catching the Vandalism on Non-Summit

There's a scandal going on with Enes Kaya and his page has been vandalized, too! You were quick to catch this! Thanks!--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 05:49, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem :) —Frosty ☃ 05:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Veronica Castro

Veronica Castro THANK GOD IS ALIVE! Be careful with your words! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lizziebarrerajhs (talk • contribs)

I don't understand... Are you question why I reverted you? If yes, it is because you blanked a large section of a page without an explanation. —Frosty ☃ 05:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)