 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Vvv321 (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
May 2013
edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Richard B. Handler, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Keri (talk) 00:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- you removed more than i did and since you think this is a site that is propoganda, you should be happy i finished the job. if you went back and looked at prior edits with real facts, you would have left it alone. you are causing the problem, not me. i am finishing your job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frtmmz1 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 19 May 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Richard B. Handler, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:12, 19 May 2013 (UT
- I do not understand what you are talking about. I am not a sock puppet or whatever that may mean. I have direct information on this subject. I have watched people add nonsense and erase facts that were quoted by actual soruces. Do some research on the subject if that is what you care about. I finished the job of erasing the last vestiges of fact that everyone else distorted. Do the work. Then you can be critical of me. And certainly nobody was making this look like a resume or a puff piece. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frtmmz1 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 19 May 2013
- You also deleted a large portion of the structure of the article. You deleted all the references and the {{reflist}} tag that displays them, the external links, and the persondata. Couple that with your statement about "erasing the last vestiges of fact", and it creates the appearance that you're deleting the article content to make a point. That's why I reverted your edit and gave the warning. —C.Fred (talk) 03:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- but where were you when all these other people did the same thing to a much larger degree? you are right, i was making a point because others are manipulating this site. people have erased most of the facts that had accurate and referenced backup and replaced it and put banners on this saying the article was a press release. i agree the original version needed a lot of clean up, but this one has none of the facts so i thought it was better off gone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frtmmz1 (talk • contribs) 14:35, 19 May 2013