Fungunerfuner

February 2015

Hello, I'm Marteau. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Painting because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Marteau (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Painting, you may be blocked from editing. Marteau (talk) 16:58, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Painting. Marteau (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fungunerfuner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't try to harass.

Decline reason:

You vandalized an article 4 times after being asked to stop repeatedly. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 17:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fungunerfuner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was tryin to improve. I just thought other users who reverted me are idiots.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you

1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 18:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your editing

Ok, I think it's debatable to whether your edits were vandalism. But they're still disruptive -- you added the image 5 times in under 40 minutes. This is edit warring, and isn't allowed. The nature of your edits also makes it seem like you were promoting your website by putting the QR code on (I won't comment on if it was intentional or not, but the fact is that it was on it). —George8211 / T 17:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Additionally, please don't call editors "idiots". —George8211 / T 18:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

And in any event, you would need an astonishingly good story to justify placing your poor definition image of a tacky painting by an unnamed artist above the iconic Mona Lisa at the top of this page. There is no realistic chance it would be accepted. Imaginatorium (talk) 18:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)