User talk:FunkMonk/Archive 14

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

→

Archive 20

Nulla Taciti

There is nothing strange about his behaviour. The fact that he calls the Syrian government a state sponsor of terrorism and a regime is evidence of a lack of neutrality on the issue. He has been making efforts to defend both Nusra and other rebels, while promoting anti-government rhetoric, all over Syrian war-related articles and I have been trying to water down his edits and find compromises constantly to make his wording more neutral. I would ask you to follow this article here Daraa and As-Suwayda offensive (June 2015–present) where I have had trouble with him and maybe way in on several issues. EkoGraf (talk) 17:54, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

'weigh in' you idiot - 'Have you ever run into an Assad supporter/sympathizer that admitted to one single Assad gov crime?'- ekograf and funkmonk - the 'neutral' writers - lol 92.3.10.13 (talk) 18:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

As I'm sure you fellows have noticed, the above IP is most certainly Sayerslle. I've filed an SPI. RGloucester — ☎ 20:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Loool. What a circus. I still think Nully is eerily similar to now banned Sopher99. FunkMonk (talk) 21:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for standing up against this person. You have my support FunkMonk. HamzaWahabi (talk) 11:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Heh, I certainly cannot do much by myself only. What we need are more consistent editors to add reliable sources that counter the extreme pro-al Qaeda/Nusra view that is currently being splattered all over Wikipedia. There is a current tendency to whitewash Nusra and hide their al Qaeda parentage just because the US/Gulf/Turkey desperately needs someone to fight Syria and Iran, and the FSA just isn't up to snuff. And Sayer, you don't have to be "pro-Assad" to dislike Wahabi terorrists. Just ask the Kurds. FunkMonk (talk) 23:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

oh, yes, - the Kurds 'the largest stateless people in the world' , [1] - 'in Syria, Iraq, Turkey, Iran - uncomfortable place to live , geopolitically, but they've been there a very long time ' - Sayer would wear a Kurdish flag, Christopher Hitchens did after all, fine 92.3.10.13 (talk) 00:22, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Referring to yourself in the third person now? Is Wikipedia-abstinence really that bad for ones health? The Druze don't have a state either, but I guess cheerleading for the Nusrats is more important. FunkMonk (talk) 00:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

That's the issue I have had to contend Funk in each of his updates of the Strategic analysis of each battle. So again I would ask to follow his edits because I can not do it on my own anymore. And thank you RGloucester. EkoGraf (talk) 00:28, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

no. its good not to edit wp - if I ever miss your views I just see what partisangirl is saying - that's you that is. 92.3.10.13 (talk) 00:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, you always had a bad habit of relying too much on Twitter. Can't help you with that addiction. You'd be more on point if you read Angry Arab to understand my views, Syriangirl writes too much Alex Jones-inspired nonsense. But I guess she's more reliable than Elizabeth O'Bagy. FunkMonk (talk) 00:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Louis Proyect is closer to my politics than any kind of caricature yu may have - angry arab worse politics - sayerslle is not , or was not, a 'disruption only' account - you are a nasty little liar behind your 'banter' aren't you. 92.3.10.13 (talk) 01:28, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, you seem to lap up anything from Western writers rather than Middle Eastern ones, which is reflective of a colonialist mindset. They need the "white man" to save them from themselves! Sure you agree with McCain and Netanyahu about Syria and Iran as well? FunkMonk (talk) 01:31, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps a topic ban on Nulla at ANI would be helpful. Im tired of restoring edits he deletes regarding Wahhabism. Im sure Khestwol can agree Blizzio (talk) 01:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

rhetoric has been an issue with the syrian civil war articles since 4 years ago,an issue we still deal with today,but everybody agrees that a pro-government rhetoric has dominated the pages since 2013 and it was discovered that some of the editors were promoting pro-government rhetoric to influence the narrative,but finally some of them have been caught.Alhanuty (talk) 02:14, 13 June 2015 (UTC) PartisanGirl is a conspiracy theorist,unreliable.Alhanuty (talk) 02:16, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

The only thing that changed since 2013 is that FSA's resident cheerleader Sopher99 was banned for sockpuppetry, Sayer ended up in a downwards spiral of edit-warring and resulting blocks, and Futuretrillionaire went on to more productive fields (writing Jesus). Kind of reflects the sorry state of the "Syrian opposition" itself; its own worst enemy. But fine revisionist history you've made up there. FunkMonk (talk) 02:19, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

what do you call Deonis2012 efforts to mess up the pages,the sudden rise of multiple accounts from Eastern Europe trying to impose a pro-government narrative on the pages,adopting pro-government sources and figures as reliable source.Alhanuty (talk) 02:29, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

To be honest, I mainly follow talk page discussions, not the eternal edit-wars. It would appear those editors don't engage in discussion, so I have not encountered them. Consensus should be reached on the talk pages, not by reverting back and forth until someone gets tired. FunkMonk (talk) 02:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

and we literally had multiple anti-government areas put as government held,until even pro-government sources admitte that they aren't.Alhanuty (talk) 02:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC) hopefully the exposure of Hannibal911,stops this disruptive flow of imposing pro-government narratives.Alhanuty (talk) 02:33, 13 June 2015 (UTC) before 2013,the narrative was neutral.Alhanuty (talk) 02:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

One sided propaganda is always bad. We need more civil editors from both sides to make it work, and less of the aggressive edit-warriors. Problem is, the latter group drives the former away, just like in the war itself. We should use the talk pages more. FunkMonk (talk) 02:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

WTF???

No idea who you are (beyond your self-description) nor do I personally give a damn about whatever your conflict is with user Sayersle, but you might help your arguments a great deal in exposing sockpuppetry if you directed them appropriately and left me out of your squabble with that other user. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.143.244 (talk) 16:48, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Funny, since you live in the same place, edit the same articles, and write in the same style. All just a coincidence, I guess. Also, I wonder how you know you were added to the sock investigation if you weren't already monitoring the page. FunkMonk (talk) 16:50, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Seriously, dud, check your paranoia. Not all heterosexual cismales are out to get you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.143.244 (talk) 16:55, 14 June 2015 (UTC) (I edited two, count'em, two, articles and commented on a third. I guess your enemy there also doesn't feel like the persecution on wikipedia of all cis/het males is a necessary function of an encylopedia ... and you know what, maybe more than one person in the world also thinks that? Otherwise, maybe you should check your assumptions.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.143.244 (talk) 16:58, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Lol. For starters, how did you know you were mentioned in the sockpuppet investigation? FunkMonk (talk) 17:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

I guess I hit the nail on the head, eh? It isn't transphobic to think that you autogynephiliacs might want to let up being so bothered by this one, in my opinion. Nor is it that rare to doublecheck what someone who is reverting attempts to improve wikipedia and reinsert paranoid LGBT junk into every article ... but, hey, if you wanna believe there's only one cis-male heterosexual out there or we're all in league trying to stifle your true expression of yourself, whatever man (sorry, ma'am) ... I don't give two f*cks. But you might want to double check those IPs; technically, they aren't even in the same country so that alone would suggest that they are unlikely to be the same individual. ;) But maybe that's just my cis/het perspective ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.143.244 (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Apart from your weird punctuation and inconsistent capitalisation, you do actually seem to write more eloquently than Sayer, I'll give you that. Not that it would be a hard achievement... FunkMonk (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Proceratosaurus

Hello friend, I came to see if the image of Gregory S. Paul is correct [2], and if so suppose that the image of Nobu Tamura must be modified. --Levi bernardo (talk) 21:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I doubt that the horn was that shape, since the upper half of the skull is missing, but we really can't know the full shape either... It should probably extend at least a bit more backwards, like Guanlong. FunkMonk (talk) 21:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Sugar ant article

I noticed that the article has been renamed, but I'm not opposed to this. I thought I would let you know just in case you were not aware. Aside from that, I have added some more information that may satisfy the comprehensiveness aspect. Life expectancy is only known for the queen, so unavailable the life expectancy for the worker and soldier caste shouldn't be enough to make the article fail. Timescale for their life stages is unknown, they mate everywhere (personal observation) and the taxonomic related questions have been covered. Extra info about nuptial flight has been found and such too. Feel free to begin the review unless you have anymore questions to ask. Burklemore1 (talk) 14:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Article alerts

I just signed WikiProject Birds up for article alerts: Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Article alerts should be live sometime tomorrow. I've been haphazardly signing organismal projects up for alerts when I've noticed they didn't have it. Just now I went through WP:TOL and made sure all of the listed subprojects were signed up (except for the defunct ones). If there are any other projects you're associated with that you want to sign up, go here: Wikipedia:Article alerts/Subscribing.

It turns out there are a couple other ways to display the article alerts on the project page, aside from the code I used for WikiProject Dinosaurs. If you want to mess with alternate display formats, see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dogs#Article_alerts and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Gastropods#Tools (at the bottom of the page). Plantdrew (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

• Cool, amazing tool! All I can think of missing is the extinction project.[3] FunkMonk (talk) 21:34, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Added extinction as well. You may already know about it (it's pretty prominently linked at WP:DINO, but there's also a project based tool that does a list of articles need cleanup that many projects aren't signed up for (birds and dinos have it, but paleo and extinction don't). Here's the report for dinosaurs Plantdrew (talk) 23:06, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Cool. I wonder why every project doesn't have all these tools per default. But I guess someone has to implement it first? FunkMonk (talk) 14:02, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Antipredator adaptation

Hi, I don't want to rush you, but I'll be away next week. We can work on it this week or the week after next (probably with an On hold in that case) as you like. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

No problem, I'll review it soon, and then you can resolve issues whenever you get the time. FunkMonk (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Dodo

Ya got a reason or was it just a blanket undo without thinking on it? Just wondering —N·M—^talk 19:19, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Did you read my edit summary? FunkMonk (talk) 19:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

I did, however there seems to be a difference between "perhaps the most accurate" in the caption and "dodo specialist Julian Hume regard it as one of the most accurate", one states it as fact and one states that someone thinks it is so. Maybe just wording but portrays the validity as... I dunno... (shrug) just not satisfying. Don't know how to word my thoughts on it. —N·M—^talk 19:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

The caption says "perhaps", so how is it stated as fact? FunkMonk (talk) 19:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Like I said, not sure how to word my thoughts on this one. So I'll drop it. —N·M—^talk 19:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Alright, would adding more opinions about the image in the text be a help? FunkMonk (talk) 19:44, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Nah, I'm good. Don't mind me. Just popped back in after a long absence. If the article has been fine all this time I sure don't need to be adding my two cents. :) —N·M—^talk 19:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Ankylosaurus

I am not one to be hung up on my formatting changes, but I would appreciate it if you provided an explanation when undoing them. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:35, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, as explained in my edit summaries, the description section is going to be completely rewritten and expanded, I didn't expect the copy edit to be done so quickly, usually the wait takes months, so that section was left hanging. When it is done, my changes will make sense. FunkMonk (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

I didn't say you didn't leave an edit summary; your edit summary did not address the revert that you made. I also really take no issue with the edit, merely your etiquette. Expand the section, by all means, and retitle it as need be. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Well, it'll teach me not to list articles prematurely. FunkMonk (talk) 15:33, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Woolly mammoth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Pyramid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Question

If you have an extant taxon with a fossil record from Epoch A to Epoch (not!Holocene), would you still put the fossil record in the taxobox as "Epoch A to Holocene" or "Epoch A to Epoch (not!Holocene)"?--Mr Fink (talk) 21:30, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

I have no idea... Not really much of a geology-bufff... FunkMonk (talk) 04:36, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

aha

I'll leave you with Wendiceratops and fix the other one....(Arcticodactylus) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:36, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

The main issue now seems to be the missing taxobox, but that's beyond my ability... FunkMonk (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

I am finding that more than a little frustrating myself with the other one...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:42, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Got it now...god those autotaxoboxes are annoying...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Heheh, yes, I hope they get simplified one day... FunkMonk (talk) 20:14, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lesser Antillean macaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morphology. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

In press paper with your theropod silhouette

Dear FunkMonk,

I'm correcting an 'in proof' paper on theropod classifications including, in one of the figures, a theropod silhouette that you created. I cited you as "FunkMonk" as being the author, yet the editor wants... your real name. Shall I, therefore, ask you your name by any chance? If you don't want to reveal it here, please contact me at this email address: christophe.hendrickx@hotmail.com

Many thanks in advance for your time and consideration.

Best regards,

--Christophe Hendrickx (talk) 09:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Alright, I'll send it! FunkMonk (talk) 15:28, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Macabeemyrma

Hey FunkMonk, I have noticed you have contributed to many palaeontology-related articles so I thought it would be ideal to see if you'd want to check out the Macabeemyrma article and give any feedback if you aren't busy. I have been thinking of nominating it to GA (I'm planning to get all Myrmeciinae genera articles to GA level or higher), but its size has made me a bit concerned since this genus has only appeared on three scientific journals and information about its ecology is entirely unknown. However, the article is very comprehensive either way; I note that the ?Oryzomys pliocaenicus article is smaller and that is a GA article, and it also has no information about its ecology. Burklemore1 (talk) 15:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Doesn't look too bad to me, main problem might be coverage, because it was published so recently. Sure you cna't find further papers that might for example deal with general features of its group? See for example the current FAC Ankylosaurus, where much of the information under palaeobiology isn't specifically just about this genus. FunkMonk (talk) 18:42, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

I believe I may have found some more information that could help the article. One source goes on about the life habits of extant Myrmeciinae ants (foraging habits, diet, using their eyes for predation and navigation), but then the authors state that "We expect these behaviors to have been the case as well in these fossil species." This is further suggested since all Myrmeciinae ants, extant and fossil, are presumed to be primitive. Burklemore1 (talk) 07:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

There are also two clades in the source that shows the possible phylogenetic position of Macabeemyrma. This could further expand the coverage. Burklemore1 (talk) 08:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Yep, both those suggestions sound pretty good. FunkMonk (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

I have added some info about its ecology. I'm very noobish when it comes to cladograms though, so that is going to be difficult for me. Also seems a chunk of info has been removed due to redundancy. Burklemore1 (talk) 04:48, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

You can request cladograms here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IJReid/sandbox/Cladogram_request FunkMonk (talk) 06:27, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Once again you have saved me from a lot of trouble, so thank you. Burklemore1 (talk) 06:53, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

No problem, I'm extremely bad at making cladograms myself... FunkMonk (talk) 06:55, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

After the cladograms are added, the article should be pretty comprehensive. I'd say it will pass GA fairly easy despite its length. Burklemore1 (talk) 07:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Cool will get on those cladograms. IJReid ^discuss 15:13, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Cheers IJReid. I hope my request wasn't confusing by the way. :P Burklemore1 (talk) 03:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

No not at all. IJReid ^discuss 15:43, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi FunkMonk. Now the dust has settled on the Maya civilization FAC, I just wanted to say many thanks for taking the time to review the article, and for supporting its promotion - after an epic haul it made FA at the weekend. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 09:13, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

No problem, definitely deserved it! FunkMonk (talk) 09:14, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Shaft wrench

Hi FunkMonk. Please have a look at the article so I don't waste my time adding full citations as per style guide if you are going to revert. Thanks, regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, better to keep the discussion on the talk page of the article. I'll create a new article for the tool then, the source doesn't mention mammoths, so it is verging on original synthesis to keep the text in the article about the mammoth. You can also make the article yourself. Either way, it will be created, and the info moved there, where it is more appropriate. FunkMonk (talk) 13:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Velociraptor

Maybe it was too hasty on my part, but I want to create a new article Velociraptor in popular culture, like other dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures because, among other reasons, shows an image of Jurassic World, in which Velociraptors shown that far from reality, and it is desirable that the images were as close to reality as possible, which obviously Jurassic World does not do. --Alejandrocaro35 (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Well, deleting text is not the way to do it. FunkMonk (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm not deleted text for no reason, but creating an article Velociraptor in popular culture, including by linking to this, on the grounds that the information is not lost.--Alejandrocaro35 (talk) 01:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Best to discuss it on the talk page of that article first. I'm not sure everyone agrees a new article is needed. FunkMonk (talk) 15:20, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 29, 2015

Hi FunkMonk. A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. It mostly follows the lead section; how does it look? - Dank (push to talk) 15:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Looks good to me! FunkMonk (talk) 16:47, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Looks good on the Main page, precious again, and thank you especially for getting the article of a missed there! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Still not sure what happened to him... FunkMonk (talk) 11:01, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Or what?![4] FunkMonk (talk) 11:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Who knows, - was a bit active everytime I checked the Precious list, so got no "missed" or "retired" label yet, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:20, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Image problem

Are you able to help with a problem about an image raised by Nikkimaria at the Mantis FAC? I don't know what to do about it, but we could resolve the matter entirely by removing the image if necessary. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

It seems to me the problem was fixed when you added the name and death of the author. FunkMonk (talk) 11:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Ah, I see that Chiswick Chap did it. Thanks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:37, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Stegosaurus

Started a new topic at the Stegosaurus talk page. LittleJerry (talk) 02:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Are you going to look at Ankylosaurus? LittleJerry (talk) 02:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, done with description? FunkMonk (talk) 05:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

I didn't know I was doing description. I was fucused on paleobiology. LittleJerry (talk) 19:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Ah, ok, in the other articles we've worked on you usually did the description and palaeobiology, whereas I did taxonomy, history and palaeoecology. So do you want to do description, or should I take over? FunkMonk (talk) 04:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

I think you would do better. I don't know what else to add. LittleJerry (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Alright, will have a look at it. You have a better grasp at English than me though, so yeah, perhaps you can give it a look afterwards. FunkMonk (talk) 16:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Would Smilodon interest you as a future project? You did Woolly Mammoth how about another iconic prehistoric mammal? I've already brought it to GA but it could still use some work. LittleJerry (talk) 20:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Certainly would, I think I could give it some more detailed taxonomy and history, as well as description. I'm only a bit afraid of the literature, as I don't have any good synthesis text. Would probably be a long term project. You think you can find more for palaeobiology? FunkMonk (talk) 20:10, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Yeah. I also think there should be a "distribution" section. The "description" can be structured like you did for the mammoth. Also extinction could be expanded. LittleJerry (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Alright, I'll order this book[5], seems it might be the most relevant book on the subject... FunkMonk (talk) 20:32, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

This paper could be used for the distribution section, as well as taxonomy: [6] FunkMonk (talk) 22:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Do you want to work on a gameplan for Smilodon after get Ankylosaurus going? LittleJerry (talk) 20:05, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I think it'll take a while for me to get fully into gear, also waiting for that sabertooth book. But I guess you can begin on the palaeobiology if you're ready? As mentioned above, I can take the classification and history, then we can see what happens with description after that. Also, I can send some scans if the book is good... FunkMonk (talk) 20:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Would you like to start now? LittleJerry (talk) 20:11, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

I don't think I'll start just soon myself, just got the sabertooth book today, and have a bunch of stuff to do in real life, so will probably be a little while before I feel up to summarising large amounts of text... FunkMonk (talk) 02:23, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

I'll probably add a few bits and pieces as I read along, though. FunkMonk (talk) 08:10, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Well that was quicker then I expected! Even though Ankylosaurus is an FA now, I do think the "Feeding" is a little disorganized (it mentions teeth/chewing/shallowing in different places, for example). LittleJerry (talk) 02:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, much faster than usual. I thought four supports were required, and a formal source review? Anyway, yeah, if there's anything you think looks weird, feel free to change it. FunkMonk (talk) 02:42, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

On another note. Could you request someone draw a picture of Kentrosaurus reaching for leaves on a tree (they could use cite 5 as a reference). I think it could go in the feeding subsection and the image currently there can move up. LittleJerry (talk) 22:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I could do it (I did the similar Paranthodon), or maybe IJReid has more time. FunkMonk (talk) 22:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I also think the human size comparison image should be like those of other dinosaurs, a green shade. LittleJerry (talk) 23:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps Foolp would be up to it as well, he uses a pretty clear style and mainly does side views, which could be good for such an image. As for size comparisons, it is mainly Dinoguy who did the green ones, everyone else do them their own way. FunkMonk (talk) 10:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry I haven't been on, I was camping. I think I can get one done, and as a bonus I will upload the sketches I did during the trip, of Cetiosauriscus, Manidens, and Dryosaurus. IJReid ^discuss 02:14, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Foolp did it, but the other illustrations would of course be nice additions. FunkMonk (talk) 11:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Would you be able to beef up the lead paragraphs of Stegosaurus? I think there could be at least three paragraphs. LittleJerry (talk) 22:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Yah, well, maybe IJReid is up to it? On this note, seems the Styracosaurus FA needs a palaeoecology section... FunkMonk (talk) 23:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Babibasiliscus

Hi FunkMonk, could you upload the images of the Plos One article of this prehistoric lizard? [7] Some of the images could be relevant for other members of Corytophanidae. Cheers, --Rextron (talk) 02:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Myrmecia GA review

Hello, the reviewer at the Myrmecia GA review has requested for a second opinion in regards to the citations and such, though I'm not entirely sure why. Could you give your input on this because it has confused me quite a bit, and I believe I have followed all the guidelines and all that stuff. Aren't source reviews meant to be that vigorous for FA candidates only? Cheers, Burklemore1 (talk) 08:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baryonyx, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rostrum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Baryonyx

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Baryonyx you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 12:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Baryonyx

The article Baryonyx you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Baryonyx for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 03:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

A Suggestion

I just had an idea concerning your page move proposal at Saber-toothed cat, in that, you think it would be less contentious to move it to Sabertooth?--Mr Fink (talk) 23:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes, problem is that is already a disambig page... FunkMonk (talk) 00:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Well... damn... *makes gesture of futility*--Mr Fink (talk) 00:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Image query

Could you take a look at the article Edwin McMillan which I am reviewing here and tell me whether the image can be used in the article. I'm told it is PD in Sweden, but that does not make it PD in the USA does it? Thanks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

The tag says "a non-simple image can only be in the public domain in the U.S.: if it entered the public domain in Sweden prior to 1996,", which seems to fit. FunkMonk (talk) 06:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Baryonyx

Hi, new paper just came out, with some bits on Baryonyx inside which might be interesting for your article: [8]. Cheers, --Jens Lallensack (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Will add it today. FunkMonk (talk) 06:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! FunkMonk (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

List of ant subfamilies

G'day, is there any possibility you could take a quick look at this? It's the oldest current FL candidate and I am not sure how long it will be active until it closes. There is one issue left that I will address, but it would be great if an editor such as yourself could check it out and give your input. Cheers, Burklemore1 (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Not familiar with lists, but will have a look. FunkMonk (talk) 07:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

OK, thank you very much. Burklemore1 (talk) 07:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Smilodon

Hi Funk, I'd be happy to add S. gracilis to the scale chart if I can find a definite measurement. Even skull length would do for now and I can just scale the body based on the others assuming the same proportions, do you know if there are any published skull lengths? Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll look for skull measurements, but in the meantime, are these limb measurements of any use?[9] From this paper:[10] FunkMonk (talk) 11:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Photo_transferred_from_German_Wikipedia

The original uploader de:Benutzer Diskussion:Arent~dewiki of the file Glyptodon-1.jpg is still active on german wikipedia (last edit on 18 october 2015), but has not activated email. You could ask him directly, if he still has the original file. --° (Gradzeichen) 13:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I will try! FunkMonk (talk) 13:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Baryonyx

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spotted green pigeon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Latham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heterodontosaurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferruginous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hezbollah Flag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hezbollah Flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Mystery bird is dodo relative pdf

Hi, I can send you a full text pdf of:

• http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v511/n7510/full/511387a.html

in partial fulfillment of your request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive16#Chapter from Psychiatrist and traditional healers – via Wiley Online Library DOI. Please use Special:EmailUser to email me so that I can reply with the pdf as an attachment. Regards, Worldbruce (talk) 04:15, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I have sent it now! FunkMonk (talk) 12:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Brachylophosaurus

Hi Funkmonk! To begin with: my thanks for the many Probrachylophosaurus images you added! Indeed, it's a pity we cannot use figure 29...Personally, I am keen on figure 10, the MOR 940 Brachylophosaurus skull. I've strongly expanded the Dutch Brachylophosaurus article and it became obvious that we could well use a few more images of that taxon. I will also further expand the English article. Figure 10 might also be nice as it compares the crucial trait of the crest cross-section.

Greetings, --MWAK (talk) 14:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Will add! Also more as we go along.. FunkMonk (talk) 14:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much!--MWAK (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Mayabazar

I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. Can you please conduct an image review on this article here? If you are not interested in doing that, can you please leave your comments there as a reviewer? All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

I'll have a look. FunkMonk (talk) 14:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Psittacosaurus

I have nominated Psittacosaurus for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKay (talk) 16:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Tarbosaurus eggs

Hi! Do you know of a reference that says that File:Tarbosaurus_egg_in_Vienna.jpg is a Macroelongatoolithus egg? I can't find any info on the specimen other than the Flickr page it's from. Thanks. Ashorocetus (talk) 17:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Yes, apparently this:[11] There used to be a free pdf of it here:[12] I might have it somewhere... FunkMonk (talk) 17:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Do you possibly know what the specimen number of the pictured eggs is or where to find other info on it? Because as-of-yet I can't see any sources making it being Macroelongatoolithus other than its identification as Tarbosaurus eggs, and the (questionable) identification of Macroelongatoolithus as being laid by Tarbosaurus. Ashorocetus (talk) 21:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, so there's no mention of the exact specimen in the paper? I don't remember. But they're in the Natural History Museum of Vienna, I guess they could be emailed... FunkMonk (talk) 01:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Well, I haven't actually gotten a hold of it yet, but I can probably get it through ILL. I did search for "Tarbosaurus" and "Macroelongatoolithus" at OeTyp and didn't find anything, but I'm not sure how comprehensive that is. I think that it's pretty safe to leave the picture there as Macroelongatoolithus, but not 100%.. Ashorocetus (talk | contribs) 22:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Passenger pigeon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarsus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

When you redirected Pre-Abrahamic religions to Abrahamic religions, what exactly was your rationale? I don't quite see why that was necessary. Dschslava (talk) 03:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

A redirect to a relevant article that explains the term is better than nothing. The term has little independent meaning. Pre-Abrahamic refers to pretty much everything from before, so there is no real article to be written, unless it becomes a disambig for ancient religions. FunkMonk (talk) 03:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Semitic people

Since this is a rather contentious area of editing, and since the move was not discussed beforehand, I have reverted your move of this article to Semitic cultures. If you still believe the article should be moved, please start am RM discussion on the article's talk page - you'll find instructions on how to do so at WP:RM. BMK (talk) 04:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Another editor started a discussion on AN/I about this move, but neglected to notify you. You can find it here. BMK (talk) 04:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Not really contentious if you read the talk page archives. Established editors have long argued that the scope of the article was inadequate. I simply moved it to a more scientifically accurate title, which has the pseudo-scientific "people" debate within its scope. FunkMonk (talk) 08:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Huia

added a link pointing to Ino

Passenger pigeon

added a link pointing to Oaks

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Solstice & Season's greetings

	Merry Christmas and happy New Year
	And thanks for your WP:contributions! Best wishes to you and your family. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC) |}

• Thanks, and same to you! FunkMonk (talk) 15:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm glad I'm not paying his electric bill. Or being his neighbor. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps he somehow gets power from the nearby river? And how come our comments are nested within the Christmas greeting template? I guess it's cosy, hehe... FunkMonk (talk) 15:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Passenger pigeon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frontispiece. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Passenger pigeon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Passenger pigeon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 13:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Passenger pigeon

The article Passenger pigeon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Passenger pigeon for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 14:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Three years ago

you were recipient no. 353 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

• Thanks! FunkMonk (talk) 12:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Passenger pigeon

The article Passenger pigeon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Passenger pigeon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

PS: I don't wish to pour cold water on your efforts, but can I recommend not starting the FAC just yet? I think it would be better to raise a DYK, that will allow at least 2-3 other people to give the whole article a cursory check, and then 12 hours on the main page (particularly on such a vital topic) is bound to shake out some other stuff. When you think everybody at WikiProject Birds and elsewhere has had their say on it, that would be a good time to raise the FAC. I know you've been wanting to see this article at top quality for some years, and it's an excellent choice, but I'd rather we didn't steam full speed into a troublesome FAC that could be avoided. (Mind you, I'm one of the biggest critics of the FA process, believing the ends don't always justify the means and getting consensus on a high-traffic article in particular is tough, so I wouldn't pay attention to what I say...) Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

I'd be pleased to do the DYK nomination. It is something the article deserves as a landmark, and this is a great opportunity. Extra eyes will help in the quest for an FA. Which hooks do you want? There are so many potentials! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:09, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Whoops, it's already at FAC hehe. I've never done DYK's (I've been credited a few times, though), I usually go straight to FAC, and have done so many times with even more difficult articles, such as dodo, woolly mammoth, and Paraceratherium. The one that dragged on the longest was Réunion ibis, I can't imagine it could ever get as bad as that... This one is pretty straightforward in comparison, I think... I don't know if DYKs can be done during FAC, but if you're up to it, 7&6=thirteen, you can run with it. FunkMonk (talk) 21:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

No problem. It is timely, it is ready. I've done lots of DYKs. Two different processes, two different tracks. We need a hook, and we need to put together a list of the biggest contributors to this article. Which shouldn't be hard. Life (and Wikipedia) is not a zero sum game. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

There are some signature facts about the bird that are often repeated, its numbers, the flocks that blocked the sun, and the speed at which it went from billions to zero... FunkMonk (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Martha, and the last passenger pigeon killed by a BB gun. Or being exterminated so that barrels could be filled and the masses fed. As I said, we have a plethora of hooks. They can be proposed as alternates. OTOH, one of my wikipedia mentors has said that in WP:DYK, the KISS principle is something to abide by. A nomination sometimes becomes a committee enterprise, and we all know that a Camel is a Horse that was designed by a committee. We can't control how the nomination is processed, but we can control how it is positioned for entry.7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm fine with all of those, really. You have any favourites? FunkMonk (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

We have a week to get this done (unless somebody else steels our thunder and preemptively nominates it). Suggest that we noodle them up here and cut them after they are put in. A single DYK hook cannot exceed 200 characters. It can include a picture, and that is something I highly recommend (It increases the number of hits). Ideally it should be something considered "hooky" that is likely to attract interest and further exploration. It must be supported (in the article that is) by a cited reliable source. The precise wording is really important critical. Shorter is generally better. I'll try to come up with a few trial balloons. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

And even if we are preempted, we can submit alternate hooks. So no worries on that score. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Ok, notify me when I need to do something! I don't think anyone will "steal" it, hehe... FunkMonk (talk) 23:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

You'd be surprised. Low hanging fruit. It is a lot less work than actually doing the work and creating the article. And nominator's get a badge! 00:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

You were right![13] FunkMonk (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

HI! I see you are reviewing Lebensraum (an article I nominated).

Could you review the Battle of France? That would be great! Here is the review page link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_France/GA2&action=edit&editintro=Template:GAN/editintro&preload=Template:GAN/preload KevinNinja (talk) 04:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Haven't reviewed articles about battles before, so I'll wait and see if someone more experienced takes it before I do. How's it going with the missing sources for Lebensraum, by the way? I'll continue the review after that crucial issue is fixed. FunkMonk (talk) 16:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

GOCE copyedit

Thanks! FunkMonk (talk) 17:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Mayabazar

Mayabazar turns a FA! Thanks for your contribution as an image reviewer. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations, and keep them coming! FunkMonk (talk) 12:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heterodontosaurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page S-curve. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 29, 2016

Another one of your fine entries. Corinne did most of this summary. How does it look? - Dank (push to talk) 23:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Saw it earlier when it was linked on the article's talk page, looks good to me! FunkMonk (talk) 23:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heterodontosaurus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Enamel and Canine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Passenger pigeon

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject TAFI

Hello, FunkMonk. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement, a project dedicated to significantly improving articles with collaborative editing in a week's time. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Article nomination board. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Thanks for your consideration. Bananasoldier (talk) 04:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spotted green pigeon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Latham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your impressive articles on mammoth, I hereby award you this editor's barnstar. Your articles are so good, I even felt pride in my inner caveman soul! Iry-Hor (talk) 10:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Yeah, my mission is to revert us all to an earlier state... FunkMonk (talk) 11:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spotted green pigeon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spotted green pigeon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 12:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Heterodontosaurus

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Heterodontosaurus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 2604:2000:B949:A000:91A6:C9B7:837E:EFD1 -- 2604:2000:B949:A000:91A6:C9B7:837E:EFD1 (talk) 21:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Conversions

Well, I will suggest several things you can read to learn about using the conversion template, but I recommend not sitting down to read them until you are in a calm state of mind, and not trying to read all of it at once, or you will get a headache. They are:

• WP:UNITS
• MOS:CONVERSIONS
• Help:Convert
• Template:Convert

If you find something that you think you might use, and you want to remember it, you can post a link to it on your own talk page (see the top of my talk page) so you can find it again. You can also list links and conversion templates in a way that will not activate them. You just put the link or template between the two halves of the "nowiki" template. You could also list a few example conversions just to remind yourself of how to do it. Read especially how to limit the number of decimal points, and how to make the template show up with the abbreviation instead of the word written out (if that's what you want), and how to express a range, and how to express a unit in its adjective form. Once you become familiar with it, it's easy. I recommend looking at it in "Preview" before saving just to be sure you got it right. Corinne (talk) 21:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Wow, thanks a lot, I'll take it in small doses, hehe... FunkMonk (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

• Tadaa![14] FunkMonk (talk) 12:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)