User talk:Fyoliveira1/sandbox

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Fontenez in topic Peer Review

Francesca, Could you let me know if you receive this? Thank you. Lecaldwell (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

edit

Great draft, the tables are well explained and clear. Maybe add some images if possible. I would also recommend adding a little more to the historical background to provide a better understanding of the twelve tables. Of course there are some citations missing here but no glaring issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abond3 (talkcontribs) 01:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

edit

I think adding what is actually said on the twelve tables is very crucial and a key component to your wikipedia entry. I think the topic is somewhat limited with accessible info past what is said on the table and you probably don't want to post objective claims about it. I met with a librarian when I was at a deadlock finding sources and I was referred to a number of really good books at our library. Also, my good friend, Quazi, is doing the same topic. All in all, the topic is very interesting and what you have thus far is definitely a great start! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smuse40 (talkcontribs) 13:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

I think the 12 tables are a vital subject to discuss considering they set up a sort of rubric for the Romans to follow. These tables also shaped their culture through the rules and regulations they created. It would be really interesting to see if there were any economic repercussions to certain laws in Rome as well. In another class recently we evaluated economic impacts of laws and if anyone benefitted from certain laws. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fontenez (talkcontribs) 19:03, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply