Gündoğdu

Hello, Gündoğdu. You have new messages at Nedim Ardoğa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Gündoğdu. You have new messages at talk:Osman I.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Warning

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Removing sourced and relevant material on false pretense just because you don't like it is disruptive and will not be tolerated. Athenean (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Gündoğdu reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: ). Thank you. Dr. K. 17:18, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Final warning. Next stop is WP:AN3. Athenean (talk) 16:43, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Athenian knows what he is talking about! As many times as he has been temp-blocked for edit-warring and topic-blocked for over a year on a wide range of topics, his opinion on this matter has weight! (Yes, there is some irony going on here . . . ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.46.194 (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Changing comments in talk pages

In this edit you changed your earlier comment, giving the edit summary "misunderstood". The problem is that three different editors already had given further comments in the same thread. Some of these comments now look wierd, since they are based on what you wrote, but which is no longer there. You are not supposed to make such changes. Please read WP:REDACT about how to do it when you want to change your comments. If you manage to clean this up before someone answers further, that is fine. If not, I will try to clean up afterwards. Regards! --T*U (talk) 20:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gündoğdu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)