User talk:G.A.S/Sandbox1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Dinoguy1000
- AWB compare this page against Category:Anime and manga navigational boxes (should be done periodically to catch new boxes)
- Last performed 2 September 2009 06:27:42
- All navboxes that are categorized there but not listed here should be placed in the "Incoming" section below
- All navboxes that are listed here but not categorized there should be listed (
[[Template:Template name]]) immediately below this line (after "Navboxes needing categorization review:") - Navboxes needing categorization review:
- To fix/remove
- Digimon templates -- lots of section links and redirects. (merge into one template, like Template:Yu-Gi-Oh!?)
- That would be preferred, but this involves setting a new template up from scratch. I first need to figure out the scope, which is somewhat difficult as Category:Digimon contains redirects, and Category:Redirects from Digimon is not complete (Rendering a list compare useless). ~Back to categorising redirects~ G.A.Stalk 05:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- With any luck, Category:WikiProject Digimon articles should exclude redirects shortly... G.A.Stalk 05:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- Articles listed below... Some serious out-of-universe sorting is required. A lot of "character" articles should be merged to a list, so one template should be fine. The character section is going to be ridiculous O_o G.A.Stalk 05:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- According to Farix, apparently each "season" of Digimon is actually a separate series, complete with a new cast of characters and a different plot - I'm not familiar with Digimon (doesn't interest me in the least TBH), I can't assess the accuracy of his claim, but see no reason not to trust him. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- I got that impression when I glanced over the anime articles... but that would, in my opinion only justify the "by series" character lists. Still quite a lot of merging required. In my opinion, one Digimon list + articles for notable Digimon (if any) should suffice. Everything considered, I recommend a single template. What do you think (I will draw up a draft tomorrow, unless you beat me to it)? Maybe we should also ask Farix. G.A.Stalk 20:16, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Articles listed below... Some serious out-of-universe sorting is required. A lot of "character" articles should be merged to a list, so one template should be fine. The character section is going to be ridiculous O_o G.A.Stalk 05:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- With any luck, Category:WikiProject Digimon articles should exclude redirects shortly... G.A.Stalk 05:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- All Digimon navboxes have been replaced with {{Digimon}}, and are currently awaiting the 7-day period before they can be deleted under WP:CSD#T2. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- That would be preferred, but this involves setting a new template up from scratch. I first need to figure out the scope, which is somewhat difficult as Category:Digimon contains redirects, and Category:Redirects from Digimon is not complete (Rendering a list compare useless). ~Back to categorising redirects~ G.A.Stalk 05:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- Gundam
- A few articles not linked in any navboxes remain (mostly character articles, I think), and beyond that, links in some of the navboxes need to be properly sorted, some more metaverse article links need to be moved or added to Template:Gundam and maybe added to individual universe boxes, and Template:Mobile Suit Gundam characters needs to be sorted by series (instead of faction) and then merged to Template:Mobile Suit Gundam. (and wow, but WOW, at how far we've actually gotten in regards to merging the Gundam articles! *Kirby dance* =D ) 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Due to the amount of files in Category:Gundam work group articles, I have changed {{WikiProject Anime and manga}} to categorise Gundam files seperately from Gundam articles. Once the category contains less items we can decide on the next steps. BTW: Should Category:Gundam work group files be a distinguished subcategory of Category:WikiProject Anime and manga files or not (the latter requiring another change to the template to prevent duplication)? G.A.Stalk 05:48, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- You mean as in either-or categorization? I would say yes, because images in WP:GUNDAM's scope aren't automatically also in WP:ANIME's scope, but if we go that route, I'd prefer getting a general framework set up in the code allowing us to easily do this with other files within the scope of work groups. *goes off to propose absorbing WP:YUGIOH as a work group* 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Due to the amount of files in Category:Gundam work group articles, I have changed {{WikiProject Anime and manga}} to categorise Gundam files seperately from Gundam articles. Once the category contains less items we can decide on the next steps. BTW: Should Category:Gundam work group files be a distinguished subcategory of Category:WikiProject Anime and manga files or not (the latter requiring another change to the template to prevent duplication)? G.A.Stalk 05:48, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- A few articles not linked in any navboxes remain (mostly character articles, I think), and beyond that, links in some of the navboxes need to be properly sorted, some more metaverse article links need to be moved or added to Template:Gundam and maybe added to individual universe boxes, and Template:Mobile Suit Gundam characters needs to be sorted by series (instead of faction) and then merged to Template:Mobile Suit Gundam. (and wow, but WOW, at how far we've actually gotten in regards to merging the Gundam articles! *Kirby dance* =D ) 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Digimon templates -- lots of section links and redirects. (merge into one template, like Template:Yu-Gi-Oh!?)
- Just noticed that Template:Gundam contains links to categories and other templates... G.A.Stalk 05:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- I know... Not entirely sure what to do about it, either... BTW, should we move all this discussion to the talk page? It would help out some on the template limits and allow discussing stuff without waiting 10-30 seconds per page load. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 05:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Might be a good idea. You might also consider moving this page to a subpage of WP:ANIME/CLEANUP. (The page history was deleted before I created this list). G.A.Stalk 05:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Moved the discussion (as you can see). I'm neutral about moving it to a ANIME/CLEANUP subpage; also, I'm not sure what page history you're referring to. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 07:57, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- This page's history [1]. 09:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Moved the discussion (as you can see). I'm neutral about moving it to a ANIME/CLEANUP subpage; also, I'm not sure what page history you're referring to. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 07:57, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Might be a good idea. You might also consider moving this page to a subpage of WP:ANIME/CLEANUP. (The page history was deleted before I created this list). G.A.Stalk 05:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- I know... Not entirely sure what to do about it, either... BTW, should we move all this discussion to the talk page? It would help out some on the template limits and allow discussing stuff without waiting 10-30 seconds per page load. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 05:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)