An Open Letter to US Navy Rear Admiral Thomas J. Eccles

edit

Subject: US-Korea Joint Investigation of ROK Navy Corvette PCC-772 Cheonan Incident


Dear Sir,


I am an mechanical engineer in Korea. My daily job is to design various industrial machines and some of my career works have relevance to defence industry in Korea. I mean, I am not a mere novice out there.


I had photographed No.1 Torpedo which was blamed for the sinking of PCC-772 Choenan of Korean Navy in detail, and found serious discrepancies between the facts and the results from JIG in which you had been involved.


JIG cocluded that North Korea torpedoed the ship reffering to the facts that;

there was No.1 Torpedo salvaged, it had some Korean letters on it,
there were catalogues and drawings relating the torpedo to NK,
the torpedo and the ship had the same adsorbates and the adsorbates were resulted from aluminized explosives.


But there was NO ADSORBATES resulted from explosion of aluminized explosives on No.1 Torpedo. All the white substances on the torpedo, a.k.a adsorbates, were resulted from corrosion of aluminium or it's alloy, according to my photos. It was and is so obvious that everyone has only to look at the torpedo with their own naked eyes. Can you imagine the scene in which explosion products are digging in and penetrating below the paint already covering the surface of a torpedo?


Here is the link to my photos; http://blog.naver.com/ruleofgame/70131033874


I am not asking you to answer how corvette Cheonan had been sunk. I am asking you;

Had you ever seen the torpedo yourself at the time you were in Korea visiting as a JIG member?
Even after having seen my photos, could you keep your previous conclusion?
If you could, why?


Regards,

GB ruleofgame (talk) 13:43, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply