Gablestout

.

Proposed deletion of Revenue Lifecycle Management

The article Revenue Lifecycle Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:38, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Proper nomination process for AfD

Hello Stiche1775, I noticed that you recently added an AfD template to Jocko Willink but linked to the old discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocko Willink, which was closed in 2018. If you feel like opening another AfD on this person is worthwhile, you'll have to create a new page; however, I recommend you look into tools like Twinkle and, more importantly, the guide to deletion before proceeding, as the article was previously unanimously kept. Thanks. AngryHarpy‍^talk 07:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)