Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Information icon Hello, Gadelhak. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.Deb (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Gadelhak.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Gadelhak.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Wingc.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Wingc.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:TurbulentSpot.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TurbulentSpot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:LargeEddy.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:LargeEddy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017

edit

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mohamed Gad-el-Hak, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Rentier (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Gadelhak. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Rentier (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017

edit

  Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mohamed Gad-el-Hak, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Rentier (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohamed Gad-el-Hak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page STEM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Gadelhak. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Mohamed Gad-el-Hak, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:40, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mohamed Gad-el-Hak, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Mohamed Gad-el-Hak, you may be blocked from editing. Kj cheetham (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

Hi, Gadelhak. You have never replied to warnings and advice about self-promotion which have been offered on this page for years. (Perhaps you were not aware of having such a page?) I have blocked you indefinitely from editing the page Mohamed Gad-el-Hak for obvious self-promotion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 16:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC).Reply

Nomination of Mohamed Gad-el-Hak for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohamed Gad-el-Hak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Gad-el-Hak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MrAureliusRTalk! 03:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


  • Not sure who you're speaking to — me, or MrAureliusR, who you posted under? If you wish to appeal my ban from editing the article to an uninvolved admin, please use the template {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. It will call another admin to this page. Bishonen | tålk 14:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC).Reply

From Mohamed Gad-el-Hak: Respectfully, I would like to appeal your decision and recent actions. I will try to be brief and use short bullets.

1. Early on the creation of this page, I supplied pictures of fluid flows that I took myself and have the copyright to. Each of those photos were published in peer-reviewed journals, but at that time, I didn’t have adequate references. WP removed the pictures, and I didn’t contest.

2. I now have adequate references in peer-reviewed journals, but you removed the 14-point bullets, and with those the (secondary-sources) references.

3. All the references are secondary sources, and are not self-congratulatory.

4. I am not advocating for a product or a company, for profit or not-for-profit. This page simply describes the scholarly contributions of a university faculty. Almost everything mentioned there is supported by references to peer-reviewed journals. A notable exception, is the birth date and place, but if you want to see a birth certificate, I am glad to supply that, privately of course.

5. I have seen many similar pages written by my peers, and none of those has the dreaded COI notices you bestow upon my page.

I urge you to remove all the COI and deletion notices, restore the 14-point bullets and references that you already removed, and ask me for any proof you wish. My page does not advocate a product or a company, but all the statements there are supported by secondary sources.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gadelhak (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

From Mohamed Gad-el-Hak: Respectfully, I would like to appeal your decision and recent actions. I will try to be brief and use short bullets.

1. Early on the creation of this page, I supplied pictures of fluid flows that I took myself and have the copyright to. Each of those photos were published in peer-reviewed journals, but at that time, I didn’t have adequate references. WP removed the pictures, and I didn’t contest.

2. I now have adequate references in peer-reviewed journals, but you removed the 14-point bullets, and with those the (secondary-sources) references.

3. All the references are secondary sources, and are not self-congratulatory.

4. I am not advocating for a product or a company, for profit or not-for-profit. This page simply describes the scholarly contributions of a university faculty. Almost everything mentioned there is supported by references to peer-reviewed journals. A notable exception, is the birth date and place, but if you want to see a birth certificate, I am glad to supply that, privately of course.

5. I have seen many similar pages written by my peers, and none of those has the dreaded COI notices you bestow upon my page.

I urge you to remove all the COI and deletion notices, restore the 14-point bullets and references that you already removed, and ask me for any proof you wish. My page does not advocate a product or a company, but all the statements there are supported by secondary sources.

Decline reason:

We don't get to write about ourselves on Wikipedia. You are welcome to use the article talk page. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 19:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.