Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Galacticalguy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Galacticalguy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Xx236 (talk) 10:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Kepler-153b

edit

Thank you for your contribution, but we don't have yet anything about Kepler-153 constellation. Please add reliable references.Xx236 (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Kepler-153b

edit

Hello, Galacticalguy,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kepler-153b should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler-153b .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Lithopsian (talk) 13:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:CCast 01 11.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:CCast 01 11.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Soap Bubble Nebula.jpeg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Soap Bubble Nebula.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Interdimensional Blue

edit
 

The article Interdimensional Blue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources for verification

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (NGC 176) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating NGC 176, Galacticalguy!

Wikipedia editor Bilingual2000 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good Work. Add more info for it remain a stub.

To reply, leave a comment on Bilingual2000's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mengar Bitoon

edit

 Template:Mengar Bitoon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Unsourced NGC 192

edit

It's not a Wikipedia page yet. See NGC 176.Xx236 (talk) 11:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Galacticalguy/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, Galacticalguy. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 00:30, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Amazon Store (color)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amazon Store (color) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 86.20.193.222 (talk) 14:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of stars in the Hipparcos Catalogue for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of stars in the Hipparcos Catalogue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of stars in the Hipparcos Catalogue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 19:40, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply