Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Gambino482! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: User:Gambino482/sandbox has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Gambino482/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olanike Olugboji-Daramola (August 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 12:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olanike Olugboji-Daramola (August 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olanike Olugboji-Daramola (September 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 11:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olanike Olugboji-Daramola (September 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IntentionallyDense was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
IntentionallyDense (talk) 13:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olanike Olugboji-Daramola (September 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olanike Olugboji-Daramola (September 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 13:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit
 

Hello Gambino482. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Gambino482. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Gambino482|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 07:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@331dot
Hello 331dot,
I want to clarify that I have not been paid to edit this article. I am assisting with the edits on behalf of Olanike Olugboji-Daramola, who is not compensating me for this work.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Gambino482 Gambino482 (talk) 12:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay, but then you must make a conflict of interest disclosure. 331dot (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your article on Olanike Olugboji-Daramola

edit

Thank you, Gambino482, for your biography of Olanike Olugboji-Daramola. I've looked carefully through the article and made a number of changes in the hope that it now meets basic Wikipedia criteria. The most serious problem was that you had copied fairly lengthy chunks from other sites without re-expressing these in your own words. I have now reworded them myself in order to overcome copyright violations which must always be avoided. You will see that I have added "citation required" for important details such as her date of birth and her education. If these come from primary sources you can mention them under a section headed "External links" at the foot of the page. I hope this is the first of more biographies of notable women. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply