Edit Warring

edit

You're at the edge of violating WP:3RR at D'oh, where at least three editors have rejected your changes, but none have supported you. If you continue without achieving talk page consensus, you are very likely to be blocked. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm not exactly sure what is it that you think is so wrong with the article. It now clearly states that the first recorded mention of the sound "d'oh" is from It's That Man Again in 1945. That's really all there is to say. Gran2 07:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quite. The only edit warrior around here is you, Hullabaloo. Some other would-be gatekeeper did have an issue of sorts with 'sourcing' but I duly addressed that. On the numbers therefore, it’s just you and me … And it’s not me that’s so zealously seeking to deny Wikipedians information germane to the subject. I’m content with the web page as it is as of 18/09/2013 04:02 notwithstanding the contribution of “It’s That Man Again” (ITMA) is understated. I’ll simply place the salient facts on the ITMA page when I get round to it (I do have a life elsewhere). Oh, and as for “badly written” – could it be that my use of the term ‘ejaculation’ is posing problems for the recently educated? Gamelyn Chase