Gamingmaster83
March 2022
editPlease refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't edit anything that isn't true. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 23:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2023
editHello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know what you find wrong with my edits because they are true I'm just trying to get everybody informed, Obviously you don't give a rat's butt about accuracy So why don't you refrain From messing with my edits. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 07:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please remember to add proper sources and Wikipedia editing guidelines. And most of all, don't use personal attacks to your fellow editors. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Don't use middle finger, flipping the bird, emojis. Stop adding unsourced content. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- I made no such threats Gamingmaster83 (talk) 10:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- I tried adding a source but you wouldn't take it I added bloomingburg source but you didn't take it Gamingmaster83 (talk) 10:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, you did. Your edit summary consists of the 🖕 emoji. Emojipedia: "A middle finger emoji, used in some western cultures as a rude or insulting gesture." Wikipedia's article on the finger: "In Western culture, "the finger", or the middle finger (as in giving someone the (middle) finger, the bird or flipping someone off) is an obscene hand gesture. The gesture communicates moderate to extreme contempt, and is roughly equivalent in meaning to "fuck you", "fuck me", "shove it up your ass/arse", "up yours" or "go fuck yourself"." So my interpretation of your edit summary is that you were trying to tell me something inappropriate and I consider it to be a personal attack. If you think this is a normal way to treat others, Wikipedia might not be the place for you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- 😂 That's what you get when you keep reverting my edits that are true that I tried to put sources but you won't take them. How would you respond to someone treating you that way. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Like I said, Wikipedia is not the place for you if you think that's somehow okay. That's a personal attack. Don't do that.
- Like Masem said, adding "ACCORDING TO bloomingburg it's delayed deal with it" to an article is nowhere near an encyclopedic treatment. I'm not here to clean up your mess. Add it properly or not. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK
- Well maybe Wikipedia doesn't need to be on here then cause no matter what I put Even if it's up to you all standards You still undo it cause you don't wanna believe it. That's my issue. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-09/warner-bros-delays-suicide-squad-game-again-after-fan-backlash here's your source Gamingmaster83 (talk) 13:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please put new comments below, for readability. You think Wikipedia shouldn't be on... Wikipedia? ...Because you're not willing to add information properly? I hope you can edit constructively from now on. It's up to you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- 😂 That's what you get when you keep reverting my edits that are true that I tried to put sources but you won't take them. How would you respond to someone treating you that way. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, you did. Your edit summary consists of the 🖕 emoji. Emojipedia: "A middle finger emoji, used in some western cultures as a rude or insulting gesture." Wikipedia's article on the finger: "In Western culture, "the finger", or the middle finger (as in giving someone the (middle) finger, the bird or flipping someone off) is an obscene hand gesture. The gesture communicates moderate to extreme contempt, and is roughly equivalent in meaning to "fuck you", "fuck me", "shove it up your ass/arse", "up yours" or "go fuck yourself"." So my interpretation of your edit summary is that you were trying to tell me something inappropriate and I consider it to be a personal attack. If you think this is a normal way to treat others, Wikipedia might not be the place for you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 03:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- For the final time: stop your disruptive editing. Do not insult others and follow consensus. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 03:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'll stop insulting people when people stop being idiots, besides I've done what you asked I haven't edited the silly date As instructed. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 05:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- If anything I'll have you blocked. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 05:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- It seems you have no real intention of working properly with others. You do not follow consensus or take the time to discuss things. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:54, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hey I'm open to work properly There's 1 thing I don't condone and that's stupidity I mean I haven't touched The release date since last time But if you're gonna put a message telling people that they cannot do on here than you are the problem not me. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 06:11, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- It seems you have no real intention of working properly with others. You do not follow consensus or take the time to discuss things. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:54, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Are you? You've responded with a middle finger emoji and called others idiots. You're insisting a hidden note is removed that says to wait for confirmation by the developer or publisher. What's the benefit in that? You're edit warring, as your edits show. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AP 499D25 (talk) 06:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Look I'm sorry About all this I thought about it and you have a point But I have an message Tell him people not to edit tell us confirmed Isn't very nice. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 06:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Besides isn't that what you all are doing. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 06:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
editHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. AP 499D25 (talk) 07:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- It's interesting how people lash out at someone who is just trying to point something out. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 07:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Could you please unblock me I'm very sorry and I won't do this ever again, as it turns out I was right. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 20:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- First, that's not how you ask for an unblock. Second, you weren't blocked because you were or weren't wrong about something, you were blocked because of how you were acting. If you fail to understand you will not get unblocked. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- I do understand. I just don't understand how this whole thing works. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- First, that's not how you ask for an unblock. Second, you weren't blocked because you were or weren't wrong about something, you were blocked because of how you were acting. If you fail to understand you will not get unblocked. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Could you please unblock me I'm very sorry and I won't do this ever again, as it turns out I was right. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 20:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
March 2023
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 13:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)- I don't really understand why I'm blocked all I was doing was giving out the proper information All others Didn't want to accept that information I may have gone about it wrong But I believe I was in the right And I'm not the only one. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Honestly, Gamingmaster83, I have no desire to see you blocked. I'd rather see you edit and contribute constructively. That's what Wikipedia is all about. But if you keep repeat WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT it's clear Wikipedia is not the place for you. Now you're blocked, and you're still saying you don't really understand why. You should understand by now: you've attacked others, you've been edit warring and you're not following consensus. I've issued you several warnings, you've been part of several discussions and there has been a discussion about your attitude and edit warring. If you want to be unblocked, you need to show you understand what you've done wrong and not put the blame on others. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- I Apologize sorry I tend to be a hot head sometimes. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 18:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Honestly, Gamingmaster83, I have no desire to see you blocked. I'd rather see you edit and contribute constructively. That's what Wikipedia is all about. But if you keep repeat WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT it's clear Wikipedia is not the place for you. Now you're blocked, and you're still saying you don't really understand why. You should understand by now: you've attacked others, you've been edit warring and you're not following consensus. I've issued you several warnings, you've been part of several discussions and there has been a discussion about your attitude and edit warring. If you want to be unblocked, you need to show you understand what you've done wrong and not put the blame on others. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Can I reapply for this Appeal Gamingmaster83 (talk) 20:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:32, 13 April 2023 (UTC)- It's not exactly clear I mean I can't make heads or tails out of it Gamingmaster83 (talk) 22:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- possibly your phone is not displaying it correctly. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- can you see the block notice under March 2023? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- let's try this. Place the text unblock|reason=Your reason here between two sets of curly brackets. Fill in your reason here. sign. You will need to describe how your edits merited a block, what you would do different, and what constructive edits you would make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: Why don't you and all the other users on this Talk page just write the unblock request for Gamingmaster83 and be done with it?--Bbb23 (talk) 00:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- let's try this. Place the text unblock|reason=Your reason here between two sets of curly brackets. Fill in your reason here. sign. You will need to describe how your edits merited a block, what you would do different, and what constructive edits you would make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- can you see the block notice under March 2023? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- possibly your phone is not displaying it correctly. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- It's not exactly clear I mean I can't make heads or tails out of it Gamingmaster83 (talk) 22:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:
Appeal
editWould like to get unblocked please Gamingmaster83 (talk) 22:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Unblock
editI'm sorry I never meant to be Disruptive in vandalizing Any edits It's just nobody seems to listen to me when I know I'm right My family doesn't listen my friends don't listen nobody listens to me. I tend To last out.sorry. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 23:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please follow the instructions by Deepfriedokra as stated above. To get successfully unblocked, you'll need to place that unblock template at the bottom of your page (after reading the guide to appealing blocks first). Just simply asking to be unblocked won't work.
- Copy that unblock template (the two curly brackets with the unblock|reason inside it - the entire thing), click edit source at top of page (make sure you are in source editor, not VisualEditor), scroll all the way to the bottom, paste it there, and replace the "Your reason here" with words that give a convincing reason why you should be unblocked.
- The words you wrote above don't go exactly in line with "You will need to describe how your edits merited a block, what you would do different, and what constructive edits you would make." as Deepfriedokra said. So I strongly recommend that you read the guide to appealing blocks first before you make your unblock request. — AP 499D25 (talk) 23:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)