I Have to Place Something Else that What is Really Goes, also forgot to put and the actual franchises.

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:25, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Stop changing sourced content to something that directly contradicts the source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Rugrats Go Wild, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Now Look Here, NinjaRobotPirate! You are the one who is distributive editing on the same articles. Because the Paramount Pictures on Rugrats Go Wild article is not a production company, and Nickelodeon Movies on Several Movies is not a distribution. I will do the same thing to you if you're messing with the movies. Now put the companies back where is goes! Gareth Carraway (talk) 14:45, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

I Meant to say, Disruptive. Gareth Carraway (talk) 14:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Make reason with MrRobotPirate

edit

Now Look Here, MrRobotPirate! You are the one who is distributive editing on the same articles. Because the Paramount Pictures is not a production company, and Nickelodeon Movies is not a distribution. I will do the same thing to you if you're messing with the movies. Now put the companies back where is goes! Gareth Carraway (talk) 14:42, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is written according to what reliable sources say. If they call a company a production company, that's what Wikipedia says. If they says that a company distributed the film, that's what Wikipedia says. Your own personal beliefs are irrelevant. On Wikipedia, this is called original research, and it's forbidden. If you continue to change sourced content to text not found in the sources, you'll simply be blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:05, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Well is Completely False, because Paramount Pictures and Nickelodeon Movies cannot be Production Companies and Distribution at the same articles. Because Wikipedia should have fixed it like I did. It's oddly for us, because I will do the same thing to you if you're messing with the movies, like I said. How do you like that, huh. Gareth Carraway (talk) 09:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

I Meant to say, Change the Source back to where it was, or you will be simply blocked for you. Gareth Carraway (talk) 09:59, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hotel for Dogs (film). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:59, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't know why you lost your mind about what I mean, you completely messed up the companies on that article, I Told you a Million times. Nickelodeon Movies Is Not a Distribution, also for Cold Springs Pictures. Gareth Carraway (talk) 20:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are Completely delusional you stupid Rival, I will have you blocked by Wikipedia for messing with me and the Articles. Gareth Carraway (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

There, I Fixed it, Do not mess this article again, I MEAN IT!!! Gareth Carraway (talk) 22:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

You Idiot, With all due respect. You know how the Articles gets fixed by a good user. Every user always fixing the Articles by puting the companies back that where they belong like everything else! Gareth Carraway (talk) 05:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Gareth Carraway,
You could very well be blocked. It would benefit you to come to WP:ANI and state, calmly, your side of this dispute with no name-calling. Participating in a discussion is better than ranting on your talk page if you would like this dispute resolved. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

But I wasn't even talking to you Liz, I was Talking to NinjaRobotPirate! I'm so sorry about that, though! It's just that I was trying to fix the Articles. Gareth Carraway (talk) 06:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

That Does It, I have had it! You are completely TERMINATED!!! Gareth Carraway (talk) 03:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Complex/Rational 21:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I encourage you to reflect on some of the comments above and pay particular attention to Wikipedia's policies on verifiability and personal attacks. The reason some of your edits have been challenged or reverted is that they were not supported by reliable sources or appeared to present information contradictory to said sources. Furthermore, name-calling, shouting, and threats are disruptive behaviors and are detrimental to collaboration, which is a fundamental aspect of resolving content issues and ensuring Wikipedia articles satisfy various quality standards. I hope you can be collegial with NinjaRobotPirate, and once your block expires, concentrate on fixing the articles in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Complex/Rational 22:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I will, but not placing the companies in the wrong places in those articles. And I Mean It! Gareth Carraway (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Before I lose my mind! Gareth Carraway (talk) 02:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

But deal me in. Gareth Carraway (talk) 09:48, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

What, You Didn't see any Articles that it said Distributed by DreamWorks Distribution, unless you put the DreamWorks Pictures on the Production Company. Gareth Carraway (talk) 05:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Check the AFI reference Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shrek 2, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

ANI again

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

But the Credits said Distributed by DreamWorks Distribution, LLC. on the Original Movies. Gareth Carraway (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

and DreamWorks Animation is Uncredited in 1998-2003. Gareth Carraway (talk) 05:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Salvio giuliano 23:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Well some of the logo is needs to be added. Gareth Carraway (talk) 00:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

or fixed. Gareth Carraway (talk) 00:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm trying to fix the Articles.

edit

{unblock|reason=Your reason here Gareth Carraway (talk) 06:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)}}Reply