Garett lzs

November 2014

Hello, I'm IndianBio. Your recent edit to the page The Fame appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Red (Taylor Swift album). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:58, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

April 2015

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Lady Gaga. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Garett lzs, I don't think you are understanding the criticality of the situation. You are continuously adding nonsense, bloated up drivel on the lead, which have been reverted more than 3 times by numerous editors. You are not leaving any edit summaries, neither paying any attention to the numerous warning messages above. You are not illiterate in English that is for sure from your additions and especially since you can choose and remove warning messages. So either stop, else we have to report you for continuous disruptions. This will be my last message, next time it will be administrators contacting you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lady Gaga, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 07:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spencer^T♦C 22:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)