Flag of Canada

edit

Hi Gary, good to see you're editing. You nominated this one at WP:FAC a long time ago. I'm thinking of rerunning this one at WP:TFA on July 1 ... the article seems to me to be in pretty good shape. Any thoughts pro or con? - Dank (push to talk) 06:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure, go ahead, sounds good. Gary (talk) 19:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. The tool User:Phlsph7/HighlightUnreferencedPassages.js pointed out that the last paragraph, about Settlers, Rails & Trails, is unreferenced. Do you happen to have a reference? Would you rather pull it if we can't find a reference? - Dank (push to talk) 19:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Nope, I don't have a reference for that. You can remove it, if you want. Gary (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just a reminder that this is coming up on July 1. - Dank (push to talk) 21:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, and all who helped, today for the 2008 article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Guitar Hero

edit

Guitar Hero has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rails Day

edit
 

The article Rails Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced page on a non-notable programming language contest. Effectively unchanged for many years. Fails WP:GNG, no usable coverage found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 18:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Zelda II: The Adventure of Link

edit

Zelda II: The Adventure of Link has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:34, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Featured article review of Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

edit

I have nominated Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. λ NegativeMP1 03:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Kingston upon Hull

edit

Kingston upon Hull has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 10:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply