User talk:Gary/Archives/2023

Proposed deletion of FeedDemon

The article FeedDemon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSOFT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Issue with (and partial fix for) Nominations Viewer

Updates to the wikimedia html have broken your nominations viewer script a bit; see Wikipedia talk:Featured article review#FARC header not showing on WP:FAR. The issue seems to be that h2 tags are now wrapped in divs. I've provided a fix in that thread for stopping it from swallowing the headers into the previous collapsed nomination, though the issue also removes the collapse all/expand all links as they can't find an h2 to attach to. --PresN 18:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

The script at WP:NOMV is fixed now. Gary (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! --PresN 01:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Amino acid

Amino acid has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Temu flag fixes

Hi, There is a flag on the article for Temu (company), the most downloaded iPhone app in the United States the last few months. [1] I work there so I have a COI. I have posted Talk:Temu (company)#Request for more clean up and removing flag to deal with the last few issues in cleaning this article up so the flag can be removed. Since you are a member of the WikiProject for Internet, I thought you might possibly be interested in the topic. Thanks in advance for your consideration! Snowy2000 (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Reptile (Mortal Kombat)

Reptile (Mortal Kombat) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:17, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Metroid

Are you going to try again of that GT/FT? I think it has potential. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Samus Aran

Samus Aran has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Damien Linnane (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Samus at the end of Metroid.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Samus at the end of Metroid.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

FAR Review

I have nominated The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. NegativeMP1 16:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

"Template:US-business-bio" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Template:US-business-bio has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 7 § Template:US-business-bio until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for HDMI

HDMI has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

"Stanford Downey Architects Inc." listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Stanford Downey Architects Inc. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10 § Stanford Downey Architects Inc. until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 02:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

"Graziani + Corazza" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Graziani + Corazza has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10 § Graziani + Corazza until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 02:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Nominations viewer

Hi Gary, I don't think we've ever 'met' before, so hello! I have, however, seen your work in action with the nominations viewer. I've been mulling over its output and was wondering if a possible improvement is technically possible.

At the moment the output at FAC is as follows:

(nomination · 3 weeks old · Active today · 1 nominator · 6 participants · 2 supports)

Is there a way it can pick up and report when a source and image review has been passed or failed?

(nomination · 3 weeks old · Active today · 1 nominator · 6 participants · 2 supports · Pass source · Fail media)

The fields can remain empty until those technical reviews are undertaken, which will make it more clear which still need to be done. I'd need to run this through FAC talk to get buy-in from the wider community, but thought I'd see it it's technically viable before floating the idea more widely. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

If someone wants to build this feature, then go for it, but I don't have the time to do so. Most importantly, whoever is performing these reviews must follow a standard convention, so that it's easy for the script to pick up on it. Gary (talk) 17:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)