Garygateaux
|
April 2009
editPlease do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also WP:3RR. Kittybrewster ☎ 20:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Garygateaux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have no idea why I have been blocked. Please explain.
Decline reason:
You were blocked for the abusive use of multiple accounts; we prefer that editors use just one account.FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|I only have this one account and don't know what I have done that is abusive}}
- I have contacted the blocking administrator for further input on this matter. In the meantime, you should be aware that you are clearly edit warring at an article, and are also likely violating our Biography of Living Person policy in doing so. Even if you aren't abusing multiple accounts, you are behaving in a way that often merits a block. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Babylon93 I suspect. Kittybrewster ☎ 22:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- I absolutely am not someone called "Babylon93". I find it amazing that you people can just pick on someone and act as judge, jury and executioner without any evidence whatsoever and without any recourse for me. No wonder people complain about the cartel of Wikipedia admins and the way they behave. I wish I had never bothered to get an account now - clearly I am not in the "in" crowd so stand no chance here.
- No one really says that, except for people who get blocked for not following the rules. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- What kind of reasoned argument is that? You have effectively just confirmed that you ban whoever you want and are not accountable.
- It is possible that you are not Babylon93. But your contributions and his were extraordinarily similar, disruptive, revertive, unsourced and WP:POV. You may find that if you recognise this and undertake not to edit in this way again, your block may be reviewed. The other thing you could do is seek to be adopted by a mentor. Please sign your posts. Kittybrewster ☎ 11:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ok - if I broke the rules then I am sorry and I undertake to make sure my edits abide by the rules in the future. How do I get a mentor and how does it work? I am not Babylon93 Garygateaux (talk) 11:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- That is good enough for me. I have left a request with the blocking admin. Be patient. and read up on WP:ADOPTION. Kittybrewster ☎ 12:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you Kitty Brewster. I will read all the rules and do my best to follow themGarygateaux (talk) 13:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- That is good enough for me. I have left a request with the blocking admin. Be patient. and read up on WP:ADOPTION. Kittybrewster ☎ 12:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ok - if I broke the rules then I am sorry and I undertake to make sure my edits abide by the rules in the future. How do I get a mentor and how does it work? I am not Babylon93 Garygateaux (talk) 11:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- It is possible that you are not Babylon93. But your contributions and his were extraordinarily similar, disruptive, revertive, unsourced and WP:POV. You may find that if you recognise this and undertake not to edit in this way again, your block may be reviewed. The other thing you could do is seek to be adopted by a mentor. Please sign your posts. Kittybrewster ☎ 11:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- What kind of reasoned argument is that? You have effectively just confirmed that you ban whoever you want and are not accountable.
- No one really says that, except for people who get blocked for not following the rules. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I absolutely am not someone called "Babylon93". I find it amazing that you people can just pick on someone and act as judge, jury and executioner without any evidence whatsoever and without any recourse for me. No wonder people complain about the cartel of Wikipedia admins and the way they behave. I wish I had never bothered to get an account now - clearly I am not in the "in" crowd so stand no chance here.
- Babylon93 I suspect. Kittybrewster ☎ 22:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
please stop harassing my wife by vandalising her wikipedia entry or I will report youEdwardlucas (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)