Gasp2009
hello
Sockpuppetry case
edit
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azviz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Abductive (talk) 22:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
edit
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Gasp2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Toddst1 has been accused of sockpuppetry. In retaliation, Toddst1 has blocked his accuser (who was fed wrong information). This is a conflict of interest. I must be unblocked.
This is gone way out of hand. MuZemike originally filed a sockpuppet report here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Azviz . Then an admitted sock, Abductive added my name http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FAzviz&diff=304566370&oldid=304564474 even though I am totally unrelated to the Canadian socks. None of my articles are the same and I do not de-prod articles like those socks are accused of. Abductive should be blocked for 1. disrupting a sockpuppet request and 2. for being a sockpuppetmaster who admits creating many socks. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAreas_for_Reform&diff=303825864&oldid=303821914 Abductive attacked me because I questioned him whether it was against policy to create socks. He then informed me that Toddst1 was a sock. I fell for the bait. I am sorry.
Even if Toddst1 got mad because he and I got attacked, he should not be blocking me. That is an example of an involved administrator butting in. Besides Toddst1 did not block the true bad person, Abductive. Again, I am sorry for getting involved in this mess. Please unblock
Please include a decline or accept reason.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
=This focuses more on other's actions than your own; your unblock request should address why you should be unblocked, not why others should be blocked. Also, the accusation against Todd seems to be quite spurious, so I don't believe it's much of a conflict of interest. Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)}}
Gasp2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hersfold asked me to focus the request on myself.
TIMELINE
1. I asked Abductive about his comment that he creates multiple socks for himself. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAreas_for_Reform&diff=303825864&oldid=303821914 . I AM SORRY. THIS WAS MY FIRST MISTAKE.
2. Muzemike files a sock report against 2 Canadian socks that de-prod articles. I am not them. I never deprod articles. I am not in Canada. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Azviz
3. Aductive maliciously adds my name to that Canadian sock report. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FAzviz&diff=304566370&oldid=304564474 Abductive then tells me that Toddst1 is a sock. I shouldn't have fell for the bait. I AM SORRY FOR TAKING THE BAIT.
4. I promise not to take the bait again. Please unblock me. If you really want punishment, would you shorten the block to 12 hours and I promise never again to have any contact with Abductive and will write productive stuff, as I was doing. Gasp2009 (talk) 03:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No. This in no way addresses the reason for your block; you are plainly using this account in violation of WP:SOCK. Please log into your first account and request an unblock there. Jayron32 05:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Timeline for the unblock request
editHersfold asked me to focus the request on myself.
1. I asked Abductive about his comment that he creates multiple socks for himself. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAreas_for_Reform&diff=303825864&oldid=303821914 . I AM SORRY. THIS WAS MY FIRST MISTAKE.
2. Muzemike files a sock report against 2 Canadian socks that de-prod articles. I am not them. I never deprod articles. I am not in Canada. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Azviz
3. Aductive maliciously adds my name to that Canadian sock report. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FAzviz&diff=304566370&oldid=304564474 Abductive then tells me that Toddst1 is a sock. I shouldn't have fell for the bait. I AM SORRY FOR TAKING THE BAIT.
4. I promise not to take the bait again. Please unblock me. If you really want punishment, would you shorten the block to 12 hours and I promise never again to have any contact with Abductive and will write productive stuff, as I was doing. Gasp2009 (talk) 03:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Questions from blocking admin
editI've been asked to consider unblocking this account. Before I consider such, I'd like to hear your explanation of these edits: