Hey, I've finished up adding what I wanted to include in the asymmetric hydrogenation page and put it up for reviews as a featured article. If you'd like to weigh in on the nomination I'd appreciate it. Bmalbrecht (talk)

Thanks for the help! Especially the catch on the diagram. Bmalbrecht (talk) 12:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey, If you're up for some peer review, I've got a page on asymmetric hydrogenation that just came up that could use some fresh eyes. I'd really appreciate it if you get the chance. Cheers, Bmalbrecht (talk) 23:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello mate, I'm probably right in guessing you're an Old Oratorian, no? I saw the initials and guessed but you'll have no idea who I am :P. Few years below. Anyway, I have the school's page on my watchlist and the 'Notable Oratorians' section always bugs me. I know for a fact that Wayne Andrews went to the school, but the only verifiable source I can find is something Mr Moran mentioned in an edition of the Oratorian. That can't be cited though can it? Nimoranthu (talk) 13:49, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I haven't checked this in a while. Yes I removed some people from the "Notable Oratorians" section because they couldn't be verified by citation. I managed to find artticles for the remaining people, hence I left them. Yes I have heard that he did go to the Oratory as well as Johnnie Jackson (the Crystal Palace player), but it's nowhere in their biographies or in any reports about them. It's a shame. You can cite the Oratorian article if you manage to find it. You can see that it has been used extensively to cite most of the section regarding the "Patronal Festival". Unfortunately, Mr Moran probably wouldn't be classed as a verifiable source without the text or a recorded interview. Much of the Oratory page needs a bit of cleaning. At one stage, I sorted out the box at the beginning to help people understand the house system and the OFSTED number. It has helped, but I still think it needs organisation.Gb105 (talk) 16:39, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply