Gdawgatlanta

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

The Fascinating Tales of Lauren's Lunches

As I have warned you at the deletion debate page, I have now nominated the page for speedy deletion. If the book exists, it certainly doesn't meet the Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. But your attempts to give the article legitimacy have persuaded me that the book almost certainly doesn't exist. They include:

• Addition of links to foreign-language articles which actually refer to a completely different work;
• Claiming in the article that the book is about to be adapted by Warner Bros. as a TV series, when called on it admitting that it isn't, but adding the claim the second time in the article;
• Posting a message about the supposed book at a chat board and claiming it as a reference.

I strongly recommend you to withdraw your objections to the article's deletion; otherwise, you may be blocked from editing for vandalism by deliberately adding untrue information to Wikipedia. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

• Uploading an obvious photo montage as a book cover isn't a way to persuade anybody that the book is legitimate, either. You seem to consider Wikipedia a game - but now, the joke is over. If you make one more attempt to pass the article as fact, I am going to speedily delete it on the spot. So, are you going to amend your previous statements? - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
• You have made another attempt to pass the book as legitimate (by adding a {{hangon}} tag to the page), so I am fulfilling my promise and speedily deleting the page. As far as your blocking or unblocking goes, I'll leave it to other admins' judgement. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

By continuing to pass your article for truth even after it was deleted, you're just wasting your time and the time of other administrators. As I have said, the joke's over. If you're looking for a place for funny misinformation, you can start contributing to Uncyclopedia instead. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)