Drawception

edit
It means you can work on it there without it being deleted. If you were to leave it in article space it would be deleted. When you are ready and have perfected the article and are satisfied that it meets the criteria for inclusion, then you can either put it up for review at Wikipedia:Articles for creation or upload it yourself and hope for the best. Deb (talk) 16:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Gdcdigital. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 15:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Fiddle Faddle 15:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Having an article suggested for deletion can make one angry, and I thank you for the apology, but I never noticed anger. WHat I suggest is that you develop the article substantially in your userspace to make it pass all the relevant criteria. This essay may help you. It may not. The most important thing is good references in reliable sources. Those are pretty much the only things that cut any ice here :)
The only thing to take personally on WIkipedia is praise. All else is background noise. Fiddle Faddle 16:37, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you User:Timtrent!!! :-) So can I wait till its out of beta and ask permission? GideonWanna talk? 16:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
If you can provide sufficient references to show it is notable even in Beta, then release it into the wild. But be sure that it is in great condition. Being deleted later at WP:AFD tends to be fatal for an article. As for asking permission, no need, EVER to ask it. You are as good as anyone else, as is your opinion. If you are sure it is ready then it is ready. But you must accept that other folk may have different opinions. Fiddle Faddle 17:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you User:Timtrent You really helped me :-) GideonWanna talk? 17:06, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
You helped yourself by realising that there was nothing personal in the entire exchange. If you can create or edit all the article you touch in a spirit of making Wikipedia better rather than in a spirit of 'I must make this edit, or create this article" then you will have a long and enjoyable experience here. It is a frustrating site even when all is going well. The trick is to understand the way t works and to work well and within the parameters. You might choose, one day, to become an admin. I have chosen not to, and I've been here a while. One reason is that anything I suggest for deletion must then have a second set of eyes look at it; I cannot and do not wish to delete anything myself. Fiddle Faddle 17:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission - hope this helps -- Moxy (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC) Thanks User:Moxy Really appreciated it GideonWanna talk? 17:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Need Help on new page "Turbocam"

edit

Hey there fellow editors, TO: Subha and Tito I have been recently been making (well, not really, barely started it...) a new article, on a company called Turbocam. I need your help,

Here's the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gdcdigital/Turbocam

Cites Pages: www.Turbocam.com http://www.turbocam.com/our-story http://www.turbocam.com/our-mission

Please edit and add some information, to help me get going, I can't figure out how to start the page...

Thank you for your help! :)

GideonWanna talk? 17:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fixed your talk page archiving

edit

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 13:38, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Gdcdigital. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page The King's School, Goa, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Rejoy2003(talk) 16:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply