User talk:Ged UK/Archives/2022/September

SD of Kayadu Lohar Page.

Dear Ged UK, you deleted the page Kayadu Lohar as per an SD. I only find that the reason for a deletion is WP:CSD#G4. But according to WP:NACTOR this page is notable. I already noted this matter on the talk page of that article but I cannot find any replay there. So request you to undelete the page. Regards --Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:35, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

It was decided at the AfD discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayadu Lohar) that the subject was not notable. My job when reviewing that speedy deletion criteria is to assess whether it has changed enough since the last time it was deleted. In my view, it hadn't, the key issues raised at the AfD had not been resolved. There is now a draft article Draft:Kayadu Lohar which you're working on. I'd advise that you review the comments raised at the AfD and ensure that they're addressed before moving the article back to the mainspace, else it'll just be deleted again. GedUK  10:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

I am not working on Draft:Kayadu Lohar. You can check the log of that draft if you have any doubt. I am woking on Kayadu Lohar which was deleted. At the time of deletion the notability criteria was already changed. According to WP:NACTOR you cannot delete the new article. The problem is if you move the Draft to Main namespace my work is in trash. My name is nowhere in the history of the article. Hope I am clear. Ranjithsiji (talk) 06:34, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Wrong rollback

Hey! Thanks for reverting my edit. Honestly I have not clue what the heck happened there. I attempted to rollback from my watchlist but it said something about a possible invalid login token or something, so I went to the actual article and rolled it back. Either that or There was some remaining vandalism. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

heh, no worries! We've all done it. GedUK  15:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Looking at it now, it appears I had made a mistake. Because the vandalism on the articles was happening so quickly I assume the edit was vandalism. But in fact it was not and it was just an IP removing the remaining vandalism that I couldn't revert cause of an intermediary edit by an IP. Clearly Widr thought the same and shortly realized their mistake. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

I was just about to write my decline on AIV for that one, then it went away as the bot cleaned it. I was about to message Widr, but he's reverted himself now. All sorted :) GedUK  15:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)