Gen247
Thanks Nyttened for the advise, exactly what I need to learn. I've added the CCL tag and a contact email.
Hi everyone - the MIFF.it finally updated their website so I've provided the link to our film nomination in the article. I hope that address the notability, verifiability and citations needed warnings. Thank you. Andreas.
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rila Fukushima 2010.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Rila Fukushima 2010.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 13:50, 9 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 13:50, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Since the film poster is presumably owned by the studio, if you want it to be used under a Creative Commons license as you said in the image description, you'll have to go through an extra step to ensure that it complies with our policies. Sorry; it's meant to ensure that people can't fraudulently claim to permit an image's use when they don't have that right. You should first select the license you want from this page and place the license tag on the image description page, and then (using an email address affiliated with the studio) please send an email to permissions-en wikimedia.org declaring (1) that you have the right to release this image, and (2) that you officially release the image under the license that you picked license. This way, nobody will seriously be able to challenge the fact that it's really released under this license. Nyttend (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry for the jargon. By "place the license tag on the image description page", I mean — go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:KARMA_Poster_Laurels.jpg, hit the edit button, type the name of the template in braces, and save. For example, if you want to use the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0, type {{cc-by-3.0}} on the page. You should also explain where it's from in more detail. Nyttend (talk) 16:45, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of KARMA: A Very Twisted Love Story - Short Film
editThank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Chzz ► 14:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of KARMA: A Very Twisted Love Story - Short Film
editA tag has been placed on KARMA: A Very Twisted Love Story - Short Film, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 21:56, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rila 2010.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Rila 2010.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Karma: A Very Twisted Love Story has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources WP:GNG, just the listing in the awards, nothing else.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chzz ► 22:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Karma: A Very Twisted Love Story
editI have nominated Karma: A Very Twisted Love Story, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karma: A Very Twisted Love Story. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chzz ► 13:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:KARMA Poster Laurels.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:KARMA Poster Laurels.jpg, which you've sourced to GEN247/Bayard Studios. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 17:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Chzz ► 00:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
...now archived, in User talk:Chzz/Archive_27#Reviewing the Deletion of Karma: A Very Twisted Love Story.
Please don't reply there though; start a new thingy on User talk:Chzz for further stuff. Ta. Chzz ► 23:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)