Genealogistas

Hello, Genealogistas, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! EyeSerenetalk 17:38, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

I, the Supreme

Thank you for your edit to I, the Supreme. However, I've moved the text you added to the article talkpage for now, because while it may well be true, I don't think it fits where you placed it in the article. You also really need to provide a cite that backs up the claim made by the text - that the "main source" for Francia's documents is the Colección Doroteo Bareiro - rather than just linking to the collection. Please feel free to comment on the article talkpage if you wish. All the best, and welcome to Wikipedia, EyeSerene^talk 17:38, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. Based on the information you gave, I have added your contribution to the "Further reading" section of José Gaspar Rodríguez de Francia; this should help to direct readers to the collection. I hope I have got the details right - please correct it if I haven't!

If you can also provide a source that Roa Bastos used the collection for his novel I, the Supreme, I agree that we should include it in that article too. However, we do need a printed source for that (see WP:RS) - even though I don't doubt your word, unfortunately neither your word, or mine, or anyones, is considered a reliable source by Wikipedia. Thank you again for your help. EyeSerene^talk 19:47, 15 September 2009 (UTC)