GeoLewis

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello! GeoLewis, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

• Comment: Error: There was no comment detected! Please follow the instructions at Template:AfC comment. I've left you some comments at the top of the article on what needs to be fixed; don't get discouraged! You can check GoogleBooks and GoogleNews Archive, both great places to find solid sourcing. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:35, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, GeoLewis. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — (っ◔◡◔)っ^{Ross Hill} 00:58, 9 October 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Speedy deletion nomination of Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins

Hello GeoLewis,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mr RD 14:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins

I moved this out of the name space. In any event, it was misplaced there. This was tagged for deletion as promotional. Please, please rewrite with a neutral point of view. This needs to be sourced--

Articles require

significant coverage

in reliable sources

that are independent of the subject.

Significant coverage

We need references that discuss the subject – directly, in detail. Not just passing mentions, directory listings, or any old thing that happens to have the name in it. And we need several references - not just one. These sources show that the subject is notable.

Reliable sources

We need sources generally trusted to tell the truth. Major newspapers. Factual, widely-published books. Or other high-quality mainstream publications which are careful about fact-checking and accuracy. Not: forums, fansites, MySpace, Facebook, or most blogs. Good sources make the text verifiable.

Independent

Nothing written by the subject or paid for by the subject. Not their website. Not a press release. Primary sources aren't enough: we require something independent.

A useful search tool--Wikipedia Reference Search

When you have fixed the problems, please submit for a review. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 15:14, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:GeoLewis/sandbox (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GeoLewis/sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 00:10, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I've been doing a bit of cleaning up on your draft - fixing heading formats and so on, I will have a go at formatting the references shortly. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins. JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

status

the article is at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins. I re-reviewed it informally. She is almost certainly notable, but the article still needs rewriting. Needs focus on the important parts of the career, clear statement on factual matters such as the professorship, removal of external links to her projects, removal of all adjectives of praise & importance, inclusion of substantial reviews from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. adjectives of praise, See also , Dlohcierekim's comments above, all of which are very much to the point.

If you write it properly it will be accepted, but not otherwise. Let me know on my talk p. when you think it's ready. DGG ( talk ) 01:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins

Hello GeoLewis. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Christiane Robbins".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 14 October 2014 (UTC)