GeoRugby

GeoRugby, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi GeoRugby!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello, I'm Wgolf. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not make biographies of living people without any reliable sources, thank you! Wgolf (talk) 23:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Matthew Janney

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Matthew Janney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Garchy (talk) 14:34, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

why u think that this page must be deleted? It is ordinary Rugby player's page with official sources. --GeoRugby (talk) 18:11, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

List of Language families

Dear GeoRugby, concerning this edit to the article List of language families, of course the Kartvelian languages have no proven relationship with other languages, that's what makes a Language family a Language family. Language isolate is when only one language is completely unrelated to other languages (such as Basque or Sumerian). Please see Language isolate for future detail, hope that clears it up. Cheers Inter&anthro (talk) 22:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh thank you, i thought it was also about language families with no relatives. I get it, this means only 1 Language without related languages. thank you.--GeoRugby (talk) 06:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Medieval poetry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Demetrius I. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Giorgi Koshadze

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Giorgi Koshadze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Domdeparis (talk) 12:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Matthew Janney

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Matthew Janney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Domdeparis (talk) 12:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Criteria for adding a page for a rugby player

Hi Georugby

As Georgia is not considered as a "High performance union" none of the players that you have added are considered notable unless they have played in the World Cup, Rugby World Cup Sevens, IRB Sevens World Series, Commonwealth Games, Olympics or for a team in a fully professional rugby union competition. You should blank the pages yourself for deletion and replace the text with {{Db-g7}} unless the players meet the criteria. I will be noting them for speedy deletion if you don't. Thank you for your cooperation. Domdeparis (talk) 16:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Here are the criteria for adding rugby players to Wikipedia. You can check it here WP:NRU

A rugby union person is presumed notable if he or she has played for, coached or administered:

1. a "High Performance Union" at any time^{(see Note 1)} or another test nation during an appearance at the men's Rugby World Cup^{(see Note 2)} or,
2. a team in a fully professional rugby union competition since 1995 or,
3. a team in the Rugby World Cup Sevens, IRB Sevens World Series, Commonwealth Games, Olympics, or
4. a women's national team in at least the semi-finals of the Women's Rugby World Cup.^{(see Note 3)}

Note 1: "High Performance Unions" for men are: Argentina, Australia, Canada, England, Fiji, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Romania, Samoa, Scotland, South Africa, Tonga, United States, and Wales. Women do not have this criterion.

Note 2: Non-High Performance Unions nations that have appeared at the World cup are: Georgia (2003, 2007, 2011), Ivory Coast (1995), Namibia (1999, 2003, 2007, 2011), Portugal (2007), Spain (1999), Russia (2011), Uruguay (1999 and 2003), and Zimbabwe (1987 and 1991)

Note 3: Nations that have played at the Women's World cup at the semi-final level are: Australia (2010), Canada (1998, 2002, 2006), England (1991, 1994, 1998, 2002, 2006, 2010), France (1991, 1994, 2002, 2006, 2010), New Zealand (1991, 1998, 2002, 2006, 2010), United States (1991, 1994, 1998), and Wales (1994).

The above parameters apply to all rugby union persons regardless of professional or amateur status. A player who signs for a team in a fully professional rugby competition but has not played in any games is not deemed to have participated in a competition, and is therefore not generally regarded as being notable. Youth players are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above, or if they can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG.

OMG, so you think that Georgia is not high performance team and Romania, USA, Canada, Fiji, Tonga and Samoa are high performance teams.

First of all Georgia has vote in World Rugby, Is on 11th place in the World. Has Autoqualified for 2019 RWC, crowds in USA, Canada, Romania, Tonga, Fiji and Samoa in not even close to Georgia's home matches crowd. (52,000 in 2016 REC final)

Georgia is considered as High performance Union in World Rugby (Dublin).

And Giorgi Koshadze is team member. He was participating in U20 championship in England this year. He is Playing in Georgian Championship and he will play 3 matches vs Japan, Samoa and Scotland in November. I have made sources that he is real person, playing for Georgia this november. So i DO NOT CARE if you consider Lelos and Ivory Coast as low Performance teams. World Rugby does not consider. So Thank you for your edit but It is not your responsibility to delete the page. Admins will review it and make a decision. Bye Bye... --GeoRugby (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi georugby It is not I who doesn't consider Georgia as a "high performance union" but the different editors who have edited the rugby criteria for notability please read it here "High Performance Union" Domdeparis (talk) 09:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Anzor Sitchinava for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anzor Sitchinava is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anzor Sitchinava until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 17:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Giorgi Pruidze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgi Pruidze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgi Pruidze until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Giorgi Mchedlishvili for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgi Mchedlishvili is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgi Mchedlishvili until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 15:24, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Giorgi Koshadze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgi Koshadze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgi Koshadze until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 13:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GeoRugby. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

proposed change in WP:NRU criteria

Hi I'm trying to get the notability criteria changed to enable the Georgian international players to be included following the new definition of a High performance Union by the IRB. Check out my suggestion here. Talk page NRU --Domdeparis (talk) 09:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

That guy, Giorgi Koshadze (20 years old) played 70 min against Samoa and will play as starting N13 against Scotland in Kilmarnock. That will be good to get some T2 unions in high performance. Just because World Rugby considers them as high performance teams and wikipedia does not. Thanks --GeoRugby (talk) 10:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of History of rugby union matches between Fiji and Georgia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of rugby union matches between Fiji and Georgia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of rugby union matches between Fiji and Georgia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi I feel if you want this page to be kept you really need to add more information as at the moment it is just a list of statistics and for just 2 matches that seems a little light. If you have any information about what happened during the matches that would make it notable then now is the time to add it. regards --Domdeparis (talk) 14:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

@GeoRugby: Hi sorry to insist but this page will probably be deleted if you don't fill it out with more prose and information about the matches. --Domdeparis (talk) 10:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Matthew Janney for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Janney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Janney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 05:22, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Aurillac

Hi there, I see you recently made changes to the Aurillac squad. They haven't actually updated their official website, which is still showing their 2016–17 squad (as you can see in the top left hand corner of the photo at the top). The main source for the team is the ProD2 website. Players you've added back in have left, for example Adrien Pélissié at Bordeaux and Levan Datunashvili at Langon. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 10:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Montpellier squad

Hi there GeoRugby. You recently made changes to Montpellier Hérault Rugby where you included Gela Aprasidze into the "young players integrated with the first team" section. However, he isn't in that squad according to the official squad page. If you disagree with the listing as per the reference, can you please add additional reliable sources to verify your changes? TheMightyPeanut (talk) 01:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GeoRugby. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Omar Odishvili

The article Omar Odishvili has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 World Rugby Under 20 Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marcus Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, I'm TheMightyPeanut. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Stade Aurillacois Cantal Auvergne, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kofta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GeoRugby. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of History of rugby union matches between Georgia and Japan

The article History of rugby union matches between Georgia and Japan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable; same reasons as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of rugby union matches between Georgia and Uruguay

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 12:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of History of rugby union matches between Fiji and Georgia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of rugby union matches between Fiji and Georgia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of rugby union matches between Fiji and Georgia (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 10:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Temur Chichinadze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Temur Chichinadze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temur Chichinadze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Giorgi Mikanadze

The article Giorgi Mikanadze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU and WP:GNG; article makes no assertion of notability and nothing found in a search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luka Gelashvili

The article Luka Gelashvili has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I searched but could not find evidence of being able to pass WP:NRU or WP:GNG; no evidence of any appearances at fully professional level. The article itself makes no assertion of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Giga Grigalashvili

The article Giga Grigalashvili has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion or evidence of passing WP:NRU or WP:GNG; nothing found in a search, not even database listings.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zurab Kavtaradze

The article Zurab Kavtaradze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU and WP:GNG; article makes no assertion of notability and nothing found in a search. Only capped at youth level.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beka Mamukashvili

The article Beka Mamukashvili has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU and WP:GNG; article makes no assertion of notability and nothing found in a search. Only capped at youth level.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Konstantine Marjanishvili (rugby union)

The article Konstantine Marjanishvili (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I searched but could not find evidence of being able to pass WP:NRU or WP:GNG; no evidence of any appearances at fully professional level. The article itself makes no assertion of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tengiz Zamtaradze

The article Tengiz Zamtaradze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU according to Ultimate Rugby; I searched but could not find any WP:SIGCOV and article makes no claim to notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Giorgi Menabde

The article Giorgi Menabde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU according to Ultimate Rugby and It's Rugby and I found no evidence of notability in a WP:BEFORE search nor is there any assertion of notability in the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arsen Machaladze

The article Arsen Machaladze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NRU according to GSA and has no profile on any other rugby website. In my WP:BEFORE search, I could only find trivial mentions in match reports for U20 fixtures so looks like a WP:GNG fail also.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Irakli Simsive moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Irakli Simsive, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:36, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Otar Dzagnidze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Otar Dzagnidze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otar Dzagnidze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Davit Meskhi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Davit Meskhi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davit Meskhi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mikheil Babunashvili for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mikheil Babunashvili is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikheil Babunashvili until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Revaz Jinjikhadze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revaz Jinjikhadze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revaz Jinjikhadze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Roland Kvachadze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roland Kvachadze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Kvachadze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Lasha Sajaia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lasha Sajaia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lasha Sajaia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Your edit to Georgian–Armenian War has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Jack Frost (talk) 07:21, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Thats why wikipedia is swarming with untrusted and false information. Andersen's works isnt good enough for Wikipedia?

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Irakli Simsive

Hello, GeoRugby. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Irakli Simsive, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tengiz Zamtaradze

Hello, GeoRugby. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tengiz Zamtaradze, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tengiz Zamtaradze

Hello, GeoRugby. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tengiz Zamtaradze".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Guram Kavtidze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guram Kavtidze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guram Kavtidze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Primefac (talk) 09:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vakhtang Akhobadze

The article Vakhtang Akhobadze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 00:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)