Georgelives

Please stop posting large blocks of copyrighted material. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Last warning

Post a large block of copyrighted text again and you will be blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

You will be blocked for disruptive/WP:POINT posting if you make a similar edit to this one again. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Blocked indef

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't make sense

Jclemens (talk) 05:10, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

You were blocked once for disruptive editing (adding copyvio material or trying to make an POV WP:POINT on George Carlin where there was a clear consensus that the material you were adding was inappropriate. You resumed adding the same period after your block expired, so you were blocked indefinitely. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I had no point, I simply saw it was relevent and deserved to be added. As for the copyright you removed the quote when I boiled it down to a single sentence. --Georgelives (talk) 23:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

You're trying to add WP:POV material the has nothing to do with religion in the religion section on the George Carlin article. I was not the only editor to tell you to stop doing this. You've made no other useful contributions, so you were blocked as a vandalism-only, single-purpose account. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

What Carlin said he believed in that speech was not only non scientific but a form of Pantheism hence it fit right in where I put it. And while you and a few others don't like it most people who read the article could see my edits value--Georgelives (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

If you add it again without consensus, you will be blocked again. For a longer duration. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)