Your submission at Articles for creation: Regent Rocket has been accepted

edit
 
Regent Rocket, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Comments on Regent Rocket

edit

Hello, great article! One way I could tell it's a valid topic is that when I search "Regent Rocket" on GoogleBooks I see tons of books and magazines that found the airframe worth discussing, which is what we call WP:Notability on Wikipedia and is our core criterion for whether a topic is worth an article. A few quick suggestions:

  • When you cite a book/article, please make sure you include the page number (if applicable), and if it's in a larger paper/journal please cite the author/title of the specific article in the larger work
  • Conversations, personal letters, etc are not admissible as sources, you can only cite published materials. If a regular person couldn't find the info on a shelf somewhere (virtual or real), then it's just not usable data because it's not replicable data. For an article, it should be written so that in theory anyone could track down your sources and come to the same conclusions.
  • Don't forget to bold the very first usage of the title term, and when you have a list of items use "*" to bullet the list (like I'm doing here).

Great work, hope to see more from you! Hope that these suggestions make for an even easier and smoother next article. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply