Geostar1024

Risk aversion

Umm... the article on Risk aversion (Economics) is about the same thing as the article on Risk aversion (Psychology). Why should there be two separate articles here?  Volunteer Marek  10:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Move reverted.

Greetings! I have reverted your move of Risk aversion to Risk aversion (economics). Per Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves, a community-based consensus must be developed "if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested". In this case, the page that was moved was at that title since 2005, and had hundreds of incoming links, making it highly likely that the move would be contested. Furthermore, WP:TWODABS indicates a preference against disambiguation pages with only two links, if one of them can be considered the primary topic. This is because the disambiguation function can be served just as well with a hatnote on top of one of the pages, without having to take the extra step of creating a new navigation page. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks; I guess I didn't fully understand the protocol for evaluating moves, so it seems I was too hasty. And, it's possible that the new page may get merged into the original page if a good way to do it can be found. Geostar1024 (talk) 13:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Where there are only two articles, we frequently don't use a disambiguation page at all. Cheers again! bd2412 T 14:13, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Fusion energy

Hello. I don't see how you got the numbers which you recently put in the article Energy density for fusion. I don't see them in the reference you gave. I think the true number for deuterium-deuterium fusion is around 225 million MJ/kg. Eric Kvaalen (talk) 05:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Psychology-utility-versus-objective-value-graph.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Psychology-utility-versus-objective-value-graph.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)