December 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Immigration and crime in Germany. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 01:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gerry1214 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Obviously your personal war against me continues. There is no violation of WP:3RR from my side, because two different templates were affected by my reverts. I always discussed every move, the author involved did not reply to my final statement. I had no chance to defend myself - why am I blocked overnight! And this is a clear personal war of this admin against me, because he does not like some of the sourced information that I provide. Ridiculous and a scandal indeed. But nothing new in Wikipedia, a clear strategy of some to suppress unwanted information.Gerry1214 (talk) 09:11, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The tragic result of concealment and sugarcoating like [1]. Bye.--Gerry1214 (talk) 21:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Precious anniversary

edit
A year ago ...
 
caution in current events
... you were recipient
no. 1442 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC) Four years now - we miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:46, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:CDUGenSecs

edit

 Template:CDUGenSecs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --TheImaCow (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:CDUHeads

edit

 Template:CDUHeads has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply