Gesalbte
|
Aloha
editHi there! I'm Ed, an administrator here on Wikipedia. You appear to be interested in a favorite subject of mine, battleships, so I figured that I'd drop by and leave you a quick note. :-) Welcome to the project, and if you have any questions or comments please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Cheers friend, —Ed (talk • contribs) 20:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Parikh-doeringexample.png
editFile:Parikh-doeringexample.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Parikh-doeringexample.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Parikh-doeringexample.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Userbox
editHi Gesalbte. I see you made the userbox that states This user takes sides on the working class people. A most admirable sentiment and it looks good but, sorry to say, the English is grammatically incorrect in several ways: in fact, it almost reads the opposite of your intentions.
The phrase rendered correctly and directly would be This user takes the side of the working class people. However, a better way is to remove takes and people and the plural ending for classes as they are redundant (working class is understood to be a collective noun in this context). It now reads: This user is on the side of the working class. What do you think?
Power in the darkness - and best wishes! Plutonium27 (talk) 18:51, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion! I've corrected it now.
This user is on the side of the working class.
- Looks good. Happy to help any time. BTW this version is how the phrase would be rendered in everyday British English. It may possibly be that "on the side of" in this context is unfamiliar to our transatlantic comrades although, as far as I know, there is no difference in usage and "I'm on your side" etc is used there as it is here. But, should you hear otherwise, please let me know. Plutonium27 (talk) 23:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- And here's a link to that oldschool reference above: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPouip93yBE
Template:Vehicle modification has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Biker Biker (talk) 12:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Gesalbte/Userboxes/Original Sins
editUser:Gesalbte/Userboxes/Original Sins, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gesalbte/Userboxes/Original Sins and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Gesalbte/Userboxes/Original Sins during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TNstingray (talk) 22:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)