Getstan

August 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Blackburn Rovers F.C. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I suggest you rejoin the discussion instead of removing it, as this vandalism is pointless and won't get the result you desire. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:01, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

It is not up to you to decide what is vandalism. You seem to think you have a monoploy over page content. It is not pointless as I disagree with any comment/citation that puts rivals in any order other than alphabetical. It was agreed to keep the order alphabetical but others went back on their word by adding citations and one direct sentsnce which suggests one club are the biggest rivals. They aren't in my opinion. Citations should be based on fact not opinion. Getstan ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

As you feel so strongly about this you should bring up the discussion again instead of going against consensus and reverting every time (which is vandalism). There is a consensus achieved by editors of the article and all statements are backed up by citations. As you state, it is your opinion that the citations are wrong, but you don't want to provide any alternative citations that show this. This constant returning with sockpuppets to revert the edits is pointless and is not going to result in your point of view being used. Use the discussion page, but remember that if there is a consensus to use the existing, acceptable citations (as there is currently) then you must accept it. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

I have offered to apply different citations. I will not accept an order of rivals which I disagree with strongly. It is pointless to discuss it as you went back on your word and added citations after agreeing that the order would be aphabetical. Getstan ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)