License tagging for Image:Delta.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Delta.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Hu-331

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hu-331, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://mct.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/full/6/1/173. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vegetarianism, Veganism

edit

Hi, I notice you added some claims to Vegetarianism and Veganism linking soy to osteoporosis and calcium-blocking phytic acid. What is your source for this information? As per our policy on verification, we will need a reliable source for such claims to stay. Until then, I've reverted your edits on Vegetarianism and tagged your edit on Veganism as needing a citation. If a reference isn't given soon, that too will be removed.

I'm not at all opposed to having this information in the article, but it will need a reliable source. If you give one, I would be happy to re-add the content (or you can, as long as you cite your source). Thanks! -kotra (talk) 18:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Update: your statements have been reverted on Vegetarianism (by me) and Veganism (by another editor) as unsourced. Feel free to re-add them if you have a reliable source. Thanks! -kotra (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply