Your submission at Articles for creation: Personal initiative (January 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 06:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, GiannaHenkel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 06:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, GiannaHenkel. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 07:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply
edit

GH -

I ran a copyright violation software program and found many phrases taken verbatim from:

http://www.academia.edu/4445265/4._Personal_initiative_An_active_performance_concept_for_work_in_the_21st_century

David notMD (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


Hey David!

Thank you so much for your help! Did you use a free software? If yes, could you tell me the name? Otherwise is there an option you could tell me which phrases are too similar or send me marked file or something?

Thank you in advance! Gianna

GiannaHenkel This is the one I use: https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by David notMD (talkcontribs)

you might want to check the drafts again as they were re-created by Gianna at Draft:Personal initiative and Draft:Personal Initiative. GiannaHenkel, please don't follow the journal structure for the format of this article, and please rewrite this topic in your own words and use other broader sources. See WP:CLOP.You can write a much simpler article like the Proactivity article. If the concept is essentially the same as proactivity, I suggest you just edit that article with the content. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


Hey AngusWOOF, the problem is: thee submission i drafted was written by me and the author of the original articles of personals initiative. As he and a few other researchers at his department are the only researchers in this field it is kind of difficult to find broader sources on that topic.. And i don't really know it it makes sense to change the structure since there is a reason for it. We should think about you're suggestion to edit the proactivity article - would you just add a subchapter about personal initiative in that case? And wouldn't we have a similar problem with the copyright anyways?

Thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Personal Initiative (January 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


Where do i find the draft which is currently being reviewed? I thought it would have been deleted. That's why I submitted a new one with a lot of changes

AfC notification: Draft:Personal initiative has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Personal initiative. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: User:GiannaHenkel/sandbox/Personal Initiative (PI) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:GiannaHenkel/sandbox/Personal Initiative (PI). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Personal Initiative has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Personal Initiative. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi GiannaHenkel! You created a thread called Copyrighted contend at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Personal initiative (February 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:58, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Personal initiative (April 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:21, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Personal initiative concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Personal initiative, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Personal initiative

edit
 

Hello, GiannaHenkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Personal initiative".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 04:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply