Gibi789
March 2009
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Fratelli fabbri editori. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --AbsolutDan (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hello - from your edit summary I will take on good faith that you are not affiliated with Fratelli fabbri editori, so I don't see a need for the "conflict of interest" portion of the maintenance tags. However, all the other tags are appropriate, as I'll explain below:
- advert: the article reads like an advertisement
- unreferenced: the article has no reliable sources (other wiki articles are not good sources)
- notability: it's not clear (especially because there are no references) that the subject of this article is notable
- wikify: the article needs to be wikified
- deadend: the article does not link to any other articles
- orphan: little or no articles link to this article
- Please address or correct these issues before removing these tags. Thank you --AbsolutDan (talk) 23:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Gibi, do you happen to know anything about this company, based in London? I imagine it was an arm of Fratelli Fabbri, but Google is turning up little or nothing about it. I stumbled across it while disambiguating links to Fabbri and created a little stub—which may well be deleted for lack of substantial third-party coverage in ‘Reliable Sources’—so as to have something to link to.
By the way, I answered you post on my talk page there. Cheers, Ian Spackman (talk) 11:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)