Giftexpert
Welcome!
Hello, Giftexpert, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Wickethewok 06:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Wickethewok 04:54, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
One Level of Warning Too Far
editI understand that you maybe doing some invaluable good by guiding someone who's new to Wikipedia such as me, however over zealousness is not particularly encouraging. Jumping down one's throat so to speak for merely testing mark-up is no way to welcome anyone. I added one line and removed it one minute later. You sent me two warnings in quick succession, the last stating that I was on a second level warning. As I have already mentioned, I added one line to a new page and deleted it within one minute so why the second patronisation? I will assume that you that you aren't a wicked school prefect after all and that you were just mistaken with your over efficient correction of my ignorant fumblings. Giftexpert 06:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- My apologies if I added two if there was only supposed to be one. I think I thought at the time that you had written this article twice and it had been deleted twice. If I am incorrect, I apologize. Wickethewok 06:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Tip of the day project update
editJust trying to get things better organized around there. Toward that end, I've created a task list template for the project. If all the contributors to the project placed it on their user page, we could all keep in touch more easily (with announcements, alerts, etc.). It, and the latest announcements can be found at:
AMA Roll Call
editThere is currently an AMA Roll Call going on. Please visit the page and sign your name to indicate whether or not you're still active. :-) אמר Steve Caruso (desk/poll) 18:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Regarding Association of Members' Advocates
editHi, you are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, or if you have resigned, please de-list yourself from Wikipedia:AMA Members. If you are still active, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Category:AMA Requests for Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) Sorry for the template spamming - we're just trying to update our records, after we had a huge backlog earlier in the week (if you've been taking cases, then sorry, and please ignore this :)). Again, sorry, and thanks! Martinp23 21:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Woo!
editENFPs unite! Ventric 23:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Quixotic plea
edit You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c)
05:52, 23 May 2015 (UTC)