Gil987

July 2009

Per Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Uruk2008, of which you were already warned twice[1][2]. Stop adding random fringe pseudoscience links to articles like you did again here or you will be blocked from editing. --Enric Naval (talk) 23:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

About this edit adding this source, and ths other edit adding this other source, can you give a cognent explanation of why you keep adding unpublished articles from arxiv.org even after all the advice of getting better sourcs? --Enric Naval (talk) 15:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Arxiv sources published in respected university journals, such as the Cosmological Constant link ,pre-published at "Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics,University of Chicago", should meet the verifiabiliy qualifications. --Gil987 (talk)

"Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics,University of Chicago" is not a scientific journal, not a newspaper, not a book, not a publishing house, etc. That paper is unpublished. A department putting putting up a paper at arxiv is not publishing that paper, it remains unpublished until it appears in some journal.

Also, about adding this other paper, it is an invited lecture at a symposium in theoretical physics. Conference papers don't have the same weight as papers in peer-reviewed journals, and this one is an invited lecture to top it....

Get papers that have published at some journal, please. (then we can talk about good quality journals and bad quality journals, but that's a different topic) --Enric Naval (talk) 06:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

You're being discussed

Hello Gil987. Please see User talk:Looie496#User:Uruk2008 at ANI. You are welcome to add your own comment there. Since you've not responded to any past warnings, a block is now being discussed. You have continued to add questionable references to physics articles, as complained of by others at WP:Requests for comment/Uruk2008. You are also abusing multiple accounts, per WP:SOCK. EdJohnston (talk) 03:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)