There is already a talk page on the German Wikipedia. Please look and write there:

Talk page: Giorgiolupo

--Giorgiolupo (talk) 16:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The IP address has been blocked (disabled) by ‪ST47ProxyBot‬

edit

{{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. ~~~~}} Giorgiolupo (talk) 13:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The bot must be malfunctioning. It was studied only the source code by reading. Giorgiolupo (talk) 13:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

gov.genealogy.net

edit

Hi Giorgiolupo. I see you reverted a reference to gov.genealogy.net back into Boleszyn, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship. The site is user generated content, any member can create it change entries (they have a page about how to do so here). User generated content should never be used for referencing as per the reliable spurces guideline. Is there a specific reason you reintroduced the source? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 15:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I found the graphic representation helpful in understanding the complicated history of this village. If the entries can be changed, the verifiability is of course no longer guaranteed. On the other hand, there is something like quality control. Okay, I'll try to find another source. Giorgiolupo (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Franz Boehm

edit

Giorgilupo, please try at least to follow the arguments given by other users on the talk page and the summaries that came with changes. Please do not insert unsourced statements or OR. I should be sorry if I had to report you. --Medusahead (talk) Medusahead (talk) 10:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why are you again deleting all the work I did to entity linking the text? --Giorgiolupo (talk) 10:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I answered several times. Giorgilupo, again: Please source your claims in articles carefully, if you cannot, they can be removed. Instead of sourcing or answering asked questions, you are getting personal and call changes as vandalism or destruction. Be assured that they are not, but statements in article must be properly sourced.
Please note that it is considered to be impolite to write other users' names in inadequate version comments and/or to revert their changes in completely articles you haven't written a single word, obviously just because they are from the other user. ---Medusahead (talk) 11:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did at WP:AIV. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 19:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply